Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Pavlasek vs Dane Propoggia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pavlasek vs Propoggia analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Pavlasek vs Dane Propoggia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavlasek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Propoggia has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavlasek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Propoggia has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavlasek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Propoggia has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavlasek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Propoggia winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavlasek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 206/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 22/ 26). Propoggia has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 9/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pavlasek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pavlasek winning 2 and Propoggia winning 0. The last match between Pavlasek and Propoggia was at the Turkey F37, 24-09-2012, Semifinals, Hard with Adam Pavlasek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavlasek and Propoggia have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pavlasek winning 0 times and Propoggia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pavlasek winning 1, and Propoggia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavlasek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Propoggia has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavlasek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Propoggia has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavlasek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Propoggia has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pavlasek 1 - 0 Propoggia
887
Rank
72
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
295
High
33
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (294-208)
Career Total W/L
56% (235-182)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$264,170
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Dane Propoggia |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Dane Propoggia |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adam Pavlasek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Adam Pavlasek
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Adam Pavlasek
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Artur Kukasian
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Adam Pavlasek
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Mark Havlicek
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Bozo Barun
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Adam Pavlasek
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Yann Wojcik
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Adam Pavlasek
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Dane Propoggia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karlo Kranic
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomislav Jotovski
Player
Dane Propoggia
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Thomas Fancutt
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Alexander Babanine
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liam Caruana
Player
Dane Propoggia
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dane Propoggia
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Pavlasek Vs Propoggia Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
