Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Sumit Nagal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Menendez-Maceiras vs Nagal analysis and find out who is favored!
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nagal has won 55.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Menendez-Maceiras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 54.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 65.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Nagal winning 64.2% (W/L 52/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.33% of matches (W/L 41/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Menendez-Maceiras winning 3 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 7 and Nagal winning 4. The last match between Menendez-Maceiras and Nagal was at the Maharashtra Open - Pune, 31-12-2017, Q3, Hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Menendez-Maceiras and Nagal have played a deciding set 3 times, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 2 times and Nagal 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Menendez-Maceiras winning 1, and Nagal 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Menendez-Maceiras has played against opponents with an average rank of 144 while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 275.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 46.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Menendez-Maceiras 3 - 1 Nagal
13
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
865
Rank
111
High
38
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
3
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
82
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
55% (608-500)
Career Total W/L
61% (317-204)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
64% (18-10)
$504,829
Career Prize Money
$434,190
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Menendez-Maceiras VS Nagal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
Sets Won | 7 | 4 |
Games Won | 61 | 47 |
Aces (Total) | 33 | 11 |
DFs (Total) | 18 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 2:24:15 | 2:24:15 |
1st Serve % | 60% (218/362) | 55% (199/365) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (155/218) | 64% (128/199) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (74/144) | 52% (87/166) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (15/47) | 39% (9/23) |
Return Points W% | 41% (150/365) | 37% (133/362) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Menendez-Maceiras VS Nagal H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
6-3 6-4 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Sumit Nagal
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-4 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Sumit Nagal
62%
(
74 of
119)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
122)
13
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
121
|
||||
6-0 6-7(2) 6-1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Sumit Nagal
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
43%
(
37 of
87)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
79
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (18/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (44/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (359/288) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 0 | 55 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:56 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 214.64 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (1475/2097) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (992/1475) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (347/622) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (93/193) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (820/2042) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 76% (21/16) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 24% (21/5) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more