Alberto Lim vs Muhammad ALTHAF Dhaifullah Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lim vs Dhaifullah analysis and find out who is favored!
Alberto Lim vs Muhammad ALTHAF Dhaifullah Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lim has won 53.15% of points on his second serve, while Dhaifullah has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lim, in recent form, has won 50.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dhaifullah has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.1% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lim has saved 71.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dhaifullah has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lim has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 8/ 5), with Dhaifullah winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 38/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Dhaifullah has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Lim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Dhaifullah has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lim has played against opponents with an average rank of 76.31 while Dhaifullah has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lim has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dhaifullah has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lim has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dhaifullah has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lim 0 - 0 Dhaifullah
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lim VS Dhaifullah H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alberto Lim | Muhammad ALTHAF Dhaifullah |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (84/76) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.37 | N/A |
Aces Total | 29 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.19 | N/A |
DFs Total | 15 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:35:51 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 62% (278/445) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 65% (182/278) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (85/167) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (24/53) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 44% (192/439) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | N/A |
Alberto Lim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Alberto Lim
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Alberto Lim
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alberto Lim
Player
Yuttana Charoenphon
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
41%
(
31 of
75)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yi Zhou
Player
Alberto Lim
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alberto Lim
Player
Issei Okamura
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alberto Lim
Player
Ghanim Al Sulaiti
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matteo Covato
Player
Alberto Lim
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 2-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alberto Lim
Player
Grigoriy Lomakin
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
6
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Alberto Lim
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
101)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Muhammad ALTHAF Dhaifullah Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Muhammad Althaf Dhaifullah
47%
(
36 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more