Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Oct at 11:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kovacevic vs C. Ugo Carabelli

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kovacevic 1 - 0 Carabelli
They have played 3 sets in total, with Aleksandar Kovacevic winning 2 and Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 1. The last match between Aleksandar Kovacevic and Camilo Ugo Carabelli was at the BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm, 15-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Aleksandar Kovacevic getting the victory 4-6 7-5 4-0 ret..
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kovacevic | 1 |
Carabelli | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm(10-15-25)
A. Kovacevic vs C. U. Carabelli H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$757,285 | Career Prize Money | $595,100 |
54.17% (221-187) | Career Total W/L | 62.54% (379-227) |
1 | Indoor | 0 |
6 | Titles | 12 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
39.39% (13-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.90% (18-23) |
A. Kovacevic vs C. U. Carabelli Match Preview:
- Aleksandar Kovacevic has won 46.35% of points on their second serve in recent form, just edging out Camilo Ugo Carabelli, who has 46.21%. Is this difference enough for a decisive advantage in serving performance?
- Camilo Ugo Carabelli outperforms Kovacevic on second serve returns, winning 45.67% of points compared to Kovacevic's 43.61%. A strong return game might be the key here.
- In terms of first serve returns, Carabelli again leads with 26.37%, compared to Kovacevic's 20.93%. Could this factor tip the scales in Carabelli's favor?
- Facing breakpoints, Kovacevic has managed to save 59.46%, slightly ahead of Carabelli, who saved 59.04%. Under pressure, Kovacevic appears marginally more resilient.
- Carabelli shows a stronger overall match win rate over the past year, with 58.90% compared to Kovacevic's 50.00%. Will this consistency influence the outcome of this match?
- Kovacevic excels on indoor hard surfaces, winning 60%, while he struggles on grass with only 28%. Meanwhile, Carabelli's strengths lie on clay where he's won 60%, while he's yet to secure a win on grass.
- Kovacevic has faced higher-ranked opponents on average, with an opponent average rank of 179.35 compared to Carabelli's 246.45. Will this experience against tougher competition give Kovacevic an edge?
- In deciding sets, Carabelli has a significantly better success rate, winning 74% compared to Kovacevic's 42%. If the match reaches a tense final set, Carabelli may have the upper hand.
- It's worth considering current event performances and specific event histories to gauge form and predict outcomes more accurately.
Editorial Prediction (October 15, 2025, UTC):
Aleksandar Kovacevic and Camilo Ugo Carabelli present an interesting match-up with closely matched stats in several areas. Kovacevic slightly edges the second serve points, which can be crucial in tightly contested games. Meanwhile, Carabelli's superior return game stats, both on the second and first serves, offer him a distinct advantage.
Despite both players having similar under-pressure performance stats, Carabelli's better overall win record over the past year and stronger performance in deciding sets suggest a higher mental toughness in critical moments. In terms of experience, Kovacevic has played against higher-ranked opponents and performed notably well on indoor hard surfaces, which could be advantageous depending on the event conditions.
Given these insights, although Kovacevic has faced stronger competitors, the balanced edge in serving and robust return stats favor Camilo Ugo Carabelli, making him the likelier candidate to win this upcoming match.
Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Kovacevic vs C. U. Carabelli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
15 | Games Won | 11 |
13 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:4:32 | Average Match Time | 2:4:32 |
66% (59/89) | 1st Serve % | 57% (44/77) |
66% (39/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (30/44) |
50% (15/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
43% (33/77) | Return Points Win % | 39% (35/89) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Kovacevic Recent Matches Played
C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played

A. Kovacevic vs C. U. Carabelli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
54.17% (221/187) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.54% (379/227) |
52.74% (520/466) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.31% (831/570) |
51.52% (5074/4775) | Games Win/Loss | 53.62% (6949/6011) |
56.90% (132/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.68% (37/36) |
44.12% (30/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.95% (341/184) |
60.00% (54/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
27.78% (5/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/5) |
0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
3011 | Aces Total | 1135 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
1261 | Total Double Faults | 1350 |
1:36:38 | Average Match Time | 1:41:26 |
333.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 372.14 |
59% (16616/28382) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24373/39386) |
75% (12517/16616) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16161/24373) |
51% (5943/11766) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7435/15012) |
38% (833/2202) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2055/4569) |
35% (9848/27985) | Return Points Win % | 43% (17069/39931) |
41.67% (10/14) | Slam W/L | 36.36% (8/14) |
32.26% (10/21) | Masters W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
51.81% (43/40) | Main Tour W/L | 48.15% (26/28) |
58.24% (106/76) | Challenger W/L | 65.52% (190/100) |
59.09% (52/36) | Futures W/L | 66.97% (146/72) |
55% (219/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (367/579) |
15% (2/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (7/17) |
48% (96/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (82/154) |
54% (81/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (109/182) |
84% (215/180) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (349/310) |
16% (215/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (349/36) |
21% (193/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (256/67) |