Aleksandre Bakshi vs Radu Florin Macovei Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakshi vs Macovei analysis and find out who is favored!
Aleksandre Bakshi vs Radu Florin Macovei Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakshi has won 47.64% of points on his second serve, while Macovei has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakshi, in recent form, has won 51.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Macovei has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.67% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakshi has saved 62.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Macovei has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakshi has won 54.29% of matches played (W/L 19/ 16), with Macovei winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bakshi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 69/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Macovei has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 28).
- Player level: In the last year, Bakshi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16), where as Macovei has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bakshi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakshi winning 2 and Macovei winning 0. The last match between Bakshi and Macovei was at the M15 Antalya, 29-09-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Aleksandre Bakshi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bakshi and Macovei have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bakshi winning 0 times and Macovei 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bakshi winning 0, and Macovei 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakshi has played against opponents with an average rank of 98.97 while Macovei has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakshi has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Macovei has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakshi has converted 46.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Macovei has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bakshi 1 - 0 Macovei
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
891
Rank
695
High
26
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (111-83)
Career Total W/L
41% (28-40)
57% (8-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Aleksandre Bakshi | Radu Florin Macovei |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aleksandre Bakshi | Radu Florin Macovei |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (18/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (156/156) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
Aces Total | 38 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:19:12 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 77.86 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (461/803) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (324/461) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (166/342) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (34/70) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (307/792) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Aleksandre Bakshi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Ben Weintraub
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Mihai Alexandru Coman
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
14
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Tom Gentzsch
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philip Henning
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Saba Purtseladze
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Tamerlan Azizov
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Radu Florin Macovei Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Gheorghe Claudiu Schinteie
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 1-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alexander Weis
Player
Radu Florin Macovei
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Radu Florin Macovei
Player
Tudor Stefan Gheorghita
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
18 of
29)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
41
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more