Alexander Hoogmartens vs Yannik Steinegger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoogmartens vs Steinegger analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexander Hoogmartens vs Yannik Steinegger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoogmartens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Steinegger has won 42.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoogmartens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Steinegger has won 45.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoogmartens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Steinegger has saved 54.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoogmartens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Steinegger winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoogmartens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Steinegger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 46/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoogmartens winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hoogmartens winning 2 and Steinegger winning 1. The last match between Hoogmartens and Steinegger was at the M25 Arlon, 21-06-2022, Q3, Clay with Alexander Hoogmartens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoogmartens and Steinegger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hoogmartens winning 1 times and Steinegger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoogmartens winning 0, and Steinegger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoogmartens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Steinegger has played against players with an average rank of 163.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoogmartens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Steinegger has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoogmartens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Steinegger has converted 40.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoogmartens 1 - 0 Steinegger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
43% (13-17)
Career Total W/L
55% (138-113)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hoogmartens VS Steinegger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Alexander Hoogmartens | Yannik Steinegger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (42/65) | 68% (51/75) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (32/42) | 55% (28/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 35% (8/23) | 63% (15/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 50% (3/6) |
Return Points W% | 43% (32/75) | 38% (25/65) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Hoogmartens VS Steinegger H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-4 10-5 |
Alexander Hoogmartens
Player
Yannik Steinegger
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alexander Hoogmartens | Yannik Steinegger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/11) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (97/113) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.45 |
Aces Total | 0 | 47 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.39 |
DFs Total | 0 | 41 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:22:26 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 16.3 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (376/586) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (271/376) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (92/210) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 31% (11/36) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (200/593) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Alexander Hoogmartens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 1-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Alexander Hoogmartens
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Alexander Hoogmartens
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Hoogmartens
Player
Jack Loge
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Alexander Hoogmartens
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michiel De Krom
Player
Alexander Hoogmartens
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Toby Samuel
Player
Alexander Hoogmartens
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Hoogmartens
Player
Michael Shaw
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexander Hoogmartens
Player
Eric Morris
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Yannik Steinegger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mae Malige
Player
Yannik Steinegger
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yannik Steinegger
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Alec Beckley
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
119)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
9
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
56 of
76)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
112
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
41 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Liam Gavrielides
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Dominique Graf
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Antoine Walch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
11
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more