Alexis Canter vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Canter vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexis Canter vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Canter has won 50.64% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Canter, in recent form, has won 48.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.29% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Canter has saved 54.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Canter has won 47.06% of matches played (W/L 16/ 18), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Canter has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 128/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Canter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.48% of matches (W/L 16/ 17), where as Lammons has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Canter winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Canter winning 2 and Lammons winning 0. The last match between Canter and Lammons was at the Loughborough Challenger, 19-05-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Alexis Canter getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Canter and Lammons have played a deciding set 0 times, with Canter winning 0 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Canter winning 1, and Lammons 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Canter has played against opponents with an average rank of 90.32 while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Canter has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Canter has converted 42.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Canter 1 - 0 Lammons
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
886
Rank
773
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (182-175)
Career Total W/L
54% (78-67)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Alexis Canter | Nathaniel Lammons |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 10 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:7 | 1:22:7 |
1st Serve % | 52% (33/63) | 75% (52/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 73% (38/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 70% (21/30) | 29% (5/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 38% (26/69) | 30% (19/63) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(4) |
Alexis Canter
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alexis Canter | Nathaniel Lammons |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (116/112) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
Aces Total | 50 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.05 | 0 |
DFs Total | 6 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:49 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 38.5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (367/571) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (274/367) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (111/204) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 56% (19/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (184/557) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Alexis Canter
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexis Canter
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexis Canter
Player
Thomas Mathys
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oscar Lacides
Player
Alexis Canter
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oliver Ojakaar
Player
Alexis Canter
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexis Canter
Player
Philippe Renard
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexis Canter
Player
Victor Clairacq
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Filip Peliwo
Player
Alexis Canter
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
36 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
9 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Shaw
Player
Alexis Canter
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexis Canter
Player
Freddie Ridout
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more