Ali Habib vs James Markiewicz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Habib vs Markiewicz analysis and find out who is favored!
Ali Habib vs James Markiewicz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Habib has won 47.59% of points on his second serve, while Markiewicz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Habib, in recent form, has won 56.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Markiewicz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Habib has saved 61.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Markiewicz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Habib has won 60.94% of matches played (W/L 39/ 25), with Markiewicz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Habib has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21). Markiewicz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Habib has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 24), where as Markiewicz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Habib winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Habib winning 2 and Markiewicz winning 0. The last match between Habib and Markiewicz was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 20-03-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Ali Habib getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Habib and Markiewicz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Habib winning 0 times and Markiewicz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Habib winning 0, and Markiewicz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Habib has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.17 while Markiewicz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Habib has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Markiewicz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Habib has converted 38.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Markiewicz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Habib 1 - 0 Markiewicz
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (80-68)
Career Total W/L
33% (15-31)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Habib VS Markiewicz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Ali Habib | James Markiewicz |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Habib VS Markiewicz H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ali Habib | James Markiewicz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (29/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (228/194) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
Aces Total | 51 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
DFs Total | 32 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:43 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 119.67 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (686/1181) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (463/686) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (232/495) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (56/146) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (471/1109) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Ali Habib Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Ali Habib
Player
Mattias Southcombe
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
12
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Jamie Diack
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Ali Habib
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Ali Habib
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Ali Habib
75%
(
86 of
114)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ali Habib
Player
Vardan Manukyan
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
James Markiewicz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alessandro Cortegiani
Player
James Markiewicz
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
11
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Markiewicz
Player
Francesco Mineo
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 7-6(7) 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
James Markiewicz
Player
Carlo Venturini
89%
(
71 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more