Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Ighor HALMENSCHLAGER Reis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baal vs Reis analysis and find out who is favored!
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Ighor HALMENSCHLAGER Reis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baal has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Reis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baal, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Reis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baal has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baal has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Reis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Reis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Baal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Reis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baal has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Reis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baal has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baal has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baal 0 - 0 Reis
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal | Ighor HALMENSCHLAGER Reis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mayeul Darras
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
Player
Benjamin Zuniga Garcia
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brian Bozemoj
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 5-7 17-15 | H2H |
view more
Ighor HALMENSCHLAGER Reis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more