Amanda Anisimova vs Mirra Andreeva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

As we delve into the intricate world of tennis match predictions, one can't help but ponder: how crucial is second serve performance? Over the past six months, Anisimova has secured 37.77% of points on her second serve. In contrast, Andreeva has managed to clinch 42.62%. This single statistic is more than just a number—it's a pivotal indicator of potential match outcomes.

When it comes to return games, does Anisimova or Andreeva have the upper hand? An amazing fact is that Anisimova has recently succeeded in winning 48.4% of points on her opponent's second serve, while Andreeva edges slightly ahead at 48.66%. However, in first serve returns, Anisimova shines with 33.5% compared to Andreeva's 29.83%. These return percentages are critical in foreseeing who might have the advantage in this head-to-head clash.

Pressure situations can decisively swing the match. How do these players handle the heat? Anisimova has successfully saved 52.2% of breakpoints she faced recently, a notch above Andreeva, who has a saving rate of 45.95%. Such statistics are invaluable for bettors and fans hoping to predict in-game dynamics.

Overall, who's been performing better in the past year? Anisimova’s win rate stands at a formidable 64.29%, with a win-loss record of 27-15. Andreeva, however, surpasses this with an impressive 76.19% win rate and a stellar 48-15 record. Observing career surfaces, both players exhibit their prowess on clay, yet Andreeva dominates with an 81% win rate, eclipsing Anisimova’s 65%.

Considering the event level, how do their paths diverge? Playing mostly in the Masters series, Anisimova boasts a 71.43% win rate, while Andreeva shines with an 80.65% win rate. Andreeva has also faced tougher opponents, averaging an opponent rank of 53.79, compared to Anisimova's 78.05.

In high-stakes scenarios, how do these contenders fare? If this match strolls into a deciding set, all eyes might be on Andreeva, as she has emerged victorious in 70% of such scenarios over the past year, overshadowing Anisimova’s 33%. Moreover, their breakpoint conversion rates provide hints of potential success; Anisimova converts 31.82% of opportunities, while Andreeva capitalizes on 38.07%.

So, who is likely to triumph in this captivating showdown? Given the spectrum of statistical insights, Andreeva appears poised for victory. Her consistent performance on clay, superior win rates, and aptitude at saving breakpoints position her as the frontrunner in this anticipated match.