Prediction of Amanda Rodgers vs Chieh-Yu Hsu Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Rodgers vs C. Hsu

Amanda Rodgers
 USA
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
32
Age
33
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
756
491
Best Rank
224
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$6.4K
-
Plays
-

Chieh-Yu Hsu
 TPE
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
32
Age
33
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
756
491
Best Rank
224
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$6.4K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Rodgers 1 - 1 Hsu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Amanda Rodgers winning 2 and Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 2. The last match between Chieh-Yu Hsu and Amanda Rodgers was at the Charleston, 03-10-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Chieh-Yu Hsu getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Rodgers | 1 | 
| Hsu | 1 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Charleston(10-03-18)
Chieh-Yu Hsu
6
7
Amanda Rodgers
3
5
(R1) Bethany Beach(06-05-18)
Amanda Rodgers
6
6
Chieh-Yu Hsu
2
2
A. Rodgers vs C. Hsu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $6,405 | 
| 48.82% (124-130) | Career Total W/L | 49.40% (371-380) | 
| 1 | Clay | 1 | 
| 0 | Titles | 6 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
A. Rodgers vs C. Hsu Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amanda Rodgers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 28.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amanda Rodgers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.00% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Amanda Rodgers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chieh-Yu Hsu has saved 38.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Amanda Rodgers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 37.50% (W/L 3/5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Amanda Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/13). Chieh-Yu Hsu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 28/24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Amanda Rodgers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Chieh-Yu Hsu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.00% of matches (W/L 2/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Amanda Rodgers winning 1 times and Chieh-Yu Hsu being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Amanda Rodgers winning 2 and Chieh-Yu Hsu winning 2.
- The last match between Amanda Rodgers and Chieh-Yu Hsu was at the Charleston, 03-10-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Chieh-Yu Hsu getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amanda Rodgers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Chieh-Yu Hsu has played against players with an average rank of 230.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amanda Rodgers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chieh-Yu Hsu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Amanda Rodgers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chieh-Yu Hsu has converted 55.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Amanda Rodgers vs Chieh-Yu Hsu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Rodgers vs C. Hsu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 20 | Games Won | 17 | 
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 | 
| 1:19:30 | Average Match Time | 1:19:30 | 
| 52% (52/100) | 1st Serve % | 60% (68/113) | 
| 60% (31/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (38/68) | 
| 46% (22/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (21/45) | 
| 60% (9/15) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) | 
| 48% (54/113) | Return Points Win % | 47% (47/100) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Rodgers 0%, Hsu 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Rodgers 0%, Hsu 69%.
Break Points Saved %: Rodgers 0%, Hsu 46%.
A. Rodgers Recent Matches Played
C. Hsu Recent Matches Played

A. Rodgers vs C. Hsu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.82% (124/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.40% (371/380) | 
| 49.56% (279/284) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.76% (839/847) | 
| 50.73% (2517/2445) | Games Win/Loss | 50.23% (7572/7502) | 
| 48.91% (45/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.05% (242/232) | 
| 50.00% (69/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.73% (100/114) | 
| 41.67% (10/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.15% (29/30) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) | 
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 | 
| 150 | Aces Total | 509 | 
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 | 
| 211 | Total Double Faults | 925 | 
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 497.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 588.74 | 
| 58% (2291/3962) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15062/25034) | 
| 60% (1384/2291) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (8829/15062) | 
| 45% (759/1671) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (4542/9971) | 
| 46% (228/501) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1446/3000) | 
| 44% (1785/4045) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11106/24377) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/5) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 40.91% (9/13) | 
| 43.79% (67/86) | Challenger W/L | 45.69% (244/290) | 
| 57.00% (57/43) | Futures W/L | 62.77% (118/70) | 
| 49% (124/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (364/742) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 36% (12/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (53/116) | 
| 45% (25/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (87/189) | 
| 84% (131/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (384/325) | 
| 16% (131/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (384/59) | 
| 11% (123/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (367/46) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:05 AM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.47
W2
2.48
12:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.53
W2
2.33
01:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
8.1
W2
1.042
12:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.58
W2
2.22
01:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.93
W2
1.34
12:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.53
W2
2.33
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
31 Oct 2025
Anna Kalinskaya vs Victoria Mboko Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Himeno Sakatsume vs Maya Joint Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Alycia Parks vs Anna Blinkova Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Himeno Sakatsume vs Maya Joint Prediction – WTA Hong Kong Tennis Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
31 Oct 2025
Yulia Putintseva vs Viktorija Golubic Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 14-7
H2H 5-6
H2H 6-4
21:00
H2H 1-6
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Ibague
Colombia
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Trois-Rivieres
Canada
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Harlingen
United States
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Sintra
Portugal












