Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amir Weintraub vs Dekel Bar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Weintraub vs Bar analysis and find out who is favored!
Amir Weintraub vs Dekel Bar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Weintraub has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Weintraub, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Weintraub has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Weintraub has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Weintraub has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 372/ 224), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 19% (W/L 3/ 13). Bar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 126/ 159), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Weintraub winning 6 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Weintraub winning 12 and Bar winning 0. The last match between Weintraub and Bar was at the Israel F16, 29-11-2016, First, Hard with Amir Weintraub getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Weintraub and Bar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Weintraub winning 0 times and Bar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Weintraub winning 0, and Bar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Weintraub has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Weintraub has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Weintraub has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Weintraub 6 - 0 Bar
Ret.
Rank
161
High
37
Age
R
Plays
6
Total0
6
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
593
High
31
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
59% (412-288)
Career Total W/L
43% (126-166)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$136,853
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amir Weintraub | Dekel Bar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 6 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 12 | 0 |
| Games Won | 72 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:34:0 | 0:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (99/141) | 64% (94/147) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (76/99) | 61% (57/94) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (26/42) | 30% (16/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (12/19) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (74/147) | 28% (39/141) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Amir Weintraub
Player
Dekel Bar
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Amir Weintraub
Player
Dekel Bar
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Amir Weintraub
Player
Dekel Bar
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amir Weintraub | Dekel Bar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amir Weintraub Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Amir Weintraub
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Amir Weintraub
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Amir Weintraub
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Amir Weintraub
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Amir Weintraub
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Dodig
Player
Amir Weintraub
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blaz Kavcic
Player
Amir Weintraub
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amir Weintraub
Player
Yuuya Kibi
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Amir Weintraub
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
79 of
107)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Amir Weintraub
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dekel Bar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ram Kapach
Player
Dekel Bar
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edan Bakshi
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Dekel Bar
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
2
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Dekel Bar
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Shane Monroe
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Kushaan Nath
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Dekel Bar
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dekel Bar
Player
Edward Nguyen
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ronnie Schneider
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
Player
Dekel Bar
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Weintraub Vs Bar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
