Andres Martin vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Nov at 03:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Martin vs T. Zink

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Martin 1 - 0 Zink
They have played 2 sets in total, with Andres Martin winning 2 and Tyler Zink winning 0. The last match between Andres Martin and Tyler Zink was at the Knoxville Challenger, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Andres Martin getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Martin | 1 |
| Zink | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Knoxville Challenger(11-04-25)
A. Martin vs T. Zink H2H Profile
A. Martin vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- Andres Martin performs slightly better on his second serve, securing 47.15% of points compared to Tyler Zink's 45.31%. How significant is this advantage? Marginal but notable.
- In return games, Martin captures 44.92% of his opponents' second serve points, compared to Zink's 44.32%. Who holds the edge here? Martin appears slightly stronger.
- For first serve return points, Martin again has the upper hand with 28.09% over Zink's 25.72%.
- Under pressure, Zink excels at saving breakpoints, saving 57.59% compared to Martin’s 53.90%. Can this make a difference in tight situations? Quite possibly.
- Over the past year, Martin has a higher match win rate at 61.84%, while Zink sits at 54.55%.
- Martin's best surface is Hard (61% win rate), whereas Zink performs best on I.hard, also with a 61% win rate. Who struggles more on less preferred surfaces? Zink on Grass with a 50% win rate.
- Martin has a slight edge in playing at a higher competitive level, winning 60.47% of his matches in Challenger/ITF > $10K events, compared to Zink’s 45.95%.
- In challenging matches, the average opponent rank for Martin is 336.76, while Zink's is slightly stronger at 321.27.
- In deciding sets, Zink wins 53% of them, edging out Martin’s 48%. Could this hint at better endurance? Potentially.
Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, both players exhibit similar strengths and weaknesses, with slight edges visible in different areas. Andres Martin shows a consistent performance pattern on his service and return games, which historically correlates with match success.
While Tyler Zink proves himself under pressure more effectively by saving breakpoints and performing well in deciding sets, Martin’s higher win rates over the past year and performance on higher-level events signal his all-around capability on the court.
The match will be influenced by how each capitalizes on the other's weaknesses, but on balance, Andres Martin's comprehensive edge in multiple facets slightly tips the scale in his favor.
Thus, considering recent form and overall statistics, Andres Martin is likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Andres Martin vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Martin vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:4:4 | Average Match Time | 1:4:4 |
| 61% (35/57) | 1st Serve % | 48% (23/48) |
| 86% (30/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16/23) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 46% (22/48) | Return Points Win % | 30% (17/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Martin Recent Matches Played
T. Zink Recent Matches Played

A. Martin vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.76% (101/68) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.35% (100/84) |
| 57.85% (221/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.28% (218/199) |
| 53.66% (1958/1691) | Games Win/Loss | 50.91% (2047/1974) |
| 61.16% (74/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 54.84% (17/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 566 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 401 | Total Double Faults | 377 |
| 1:44:22 | Average Match Time | 1:34:37 |
| 353.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.28 |
| 63% (7272/11517) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6874/11715) |
| 68% (4975/7272) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4849/6874) |
| 51% (2145/4245) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2420/4841) |
| 43% (519/1201) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (420/1096) |
| 41% (4629/11264) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4331/11400) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 55.29% (47/38) | Challenger W/L | 43.75% (21/27) |
| 69.33% (52/23) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 60% (100/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (99/183) |
| 44% (20/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
| 56% (25/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 90% (104/94) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
| 10% (104/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
| 11% (65/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (83/12) |