Anna Bondar vs Sijia Wei Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 11:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Bondar vs S. Wei

 HUN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

 CHN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bondar 2 - 0 Wei
They have played 4 sets in total, with Anna Bondar winning 4 and Sijia Wei winning 0. The last match between Anna Bondar and Sijia Wei was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 27-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Bondar | 2 | 
| Wei | 0 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(10-27-25)
(R2) WTA 125 Jinan Open - Jinan(10-15-25)
A. Bondar vs S. Wei H2H Profile
A. Bondar vs S. Wei Match Preview:
- Second Serve Efficiency: Sijia Wei's recent second serve point win percentage is 41.16%, slightly behind Anna Bondar's 43.89%. Does this give Anna a serving advantage in the matchup? Yes, but it's marginal.
 - Return Game Advantage: Sijia Wei excels in first serve returns, winning 35.83% compared to Bondar's 30.28%. However, on second serve returns, Bondar slightly edges out Sijia with 49.42% over Wei's 47.80%.
 - Pressure Handling: When faced with breakpoints, both players perform similarly with Wei saving 49.33% and Bondar saving 49.23%. Which player handles pressure better? It's almost too close to call.
 - Win Record Insight: Over the past year, Bondar's win percentage is higher at 57.75% compared to Wei's 47.92%. Does this suggest Bondar's recent consistency gives her an edge? Likely yes.
 - Surface Performance: Sijia Wei has a 71% win record on indoor hard courts, while Bondar has an identical 71% success rate on clay. Neither favors grass, indicating potential vulnerabilities there.
 - Competition Level: Anna Bondar has excelled in higher-stake tournaments, winning 73.08%, contrasting Wei’s 46.15% at similar levels. Is Bondar more accomplished at tougher levels? Absolutely.
 - Head-to-Head Record: They’ve faced each other once, with Bondar claiming victory. Bondar leads in sets won with 2-0.
 - Opponent Strength: Bondar has faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 171.69, compared to Wei's 214.79. Does this mean Bondar is more battle-tested against tougher competition? Very much so.
 - Deciding Set Performance: If the match goes to a deciding set, Sijia holds a slight edge with a 54% win rate versus Bondar’s 48%.
 
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent second serve performance, Anna Bondar holds a slight advantage over Sijia Wei. However, Wei's edge in first serve returns may level the playing field in rallies.
Historically, Anna Bondar's higher win percentage over the past year and her success against tougher opponents suggests stronger consistency and competitiveness.
With Bondar's previous head-to-head victory and her higher success rate in competitive environments, she demonstrates a psychological and strategic edge over Wei.
Despite Wei’s slight superiority in deciding sets, Anna Bondar's overall stronger form indicates she is more likely to prevail in this upcoming match.
Given these comparisons, Anna Bondar is likely to win the upcoming tennis match against Sijia Wei.
Anna Bondar vs Sijia Wei Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Bondar vs S. Wei H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 25 | Games Won | 10 | 
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 1:22:15 | Average Match Time | 1:22:15 | 
| 59% (63/106) | 1st Serve % | 58% (73/126) | 
| 71% (45/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (42/73) | 
| 53% (23/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (15/53) | 
| 50% (11/22) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) | 
| 55% (69/126) | Return Points Win % | 36% (38/106) | 
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) | 
Recent Performance Stats
A. Bondar Recent Matches Played
S. Wei Recent Matches Played

A. Bondar vs S. Wei Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.98% (444/261) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.26% (187/104) | 
| 61.14% (988/628) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.25% (399/242) | 
| 54.13% (8167/6920) | Games Win/Loss | 55.74% (3230/2565) | 
| 55.36% (93/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.21% (166/81) | 
| 69.08% (324/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) | 
| 44.07% (26/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71.43% (10/4) | 
| 11.11% (1/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) | 
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 | 
| 2210 | Aces Total | 542 | 
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 | 
| 1228 | Total Double Faults | 909 | 
| 1:29:50 | Average Match Time | 1:21:8 | 
| 442.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.09 | 
| 59% (24595/41730) | 1st Serve % | 57% (9523/16572) | 
| 66% (16223/24595) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (6137/9523) | 
| 48% (8223/17135) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3353/7049) | 
| 47% (2367/5064) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1110/2212) | 
| 44% (18854/42493) | Return Points Win % | 48% (7977/16636) | 
| 27.59% (8/21) | Slam W/L | 52.94% (9/8) | 
| 45.00% (18/22) | Masters W/L | 16.67% (1/5) | 
| 47.37% (9/10) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) | 
| 50.00% (57/57) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (9/12) | 
| 66.28% (230/117) | Challenger W/L | 63.40% (97/56) | 
| 78.21% (122/34) | Futures W/L | 76.09% (70/22) | 
| 63% (436/696) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (184/281) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 53% (97/184) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (25/45) | 
| 50% (105/211) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (39/65) | 
| 87% (453/394) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (181/166) | 
| 13% (453/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (181/15) | 
| 20% (252/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (110/20) |