Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Harmony Tan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Apr at 05:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs H. Tan

GER
2
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Friedsam 2 - 0 Tan
They have played 5 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 4 and Harmony Tan winning 1. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Harmony Tan was at the W75 Calvi, 15-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Friedsam | 2 |
| Tan | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Calvi(04-15-25)
(R2) W75+H Poitiers(10-24-24)
A. Friedsam vs H. Tan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $638,698 |
| 60.12% (398-264) | Career Total W/L | 55.48% (390-313) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 11 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Friedsam vs H. Tan Match Preview:
Analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Friedsam has secured 40.31% of points, while Tan has achieved a slightly higher rate at 41.6%. There is a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions, making it a critical factor in evaluating the match outcome. Looking at return game statistics, Friedsam has capitalized on 47.98% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Tan's 47.79%. Similarly, the percentage for first serve returns shows Friedsam leading with 29.22%, while Tan is at 28.07%. These figures are decisive in determining who might be favored in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Friedsam has a distinctive edge, saving 53.87% of breakpoints in recent form, unlike Tan, who has managed to save 40.87%. This insight is particularly useful for in-game betting scenarios. Reviewing their performance over the past year, Friedsam boasts a commendable win rate of 70.97% (W/L 22/9), while Tan follows with a 58.33% win rate (W/L 35/25), offering a broader perspective on head-to-head predictions. Surface preferences are also telling; Friedsam excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 67% win rate (W/L 122/59) and struggles on Grass at 47% (W/L 16/18). Conversely, Tan performs best on Grass, with a 68% win rate (W/L 17/8) but faces challenges on Clay, recording a 51% win rate (W/L 128/125).
In terms of playing conditions, over the last year, Friedsam has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments valued over $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/7). Tan, on the other hand, has played primarily at the same level, securing 60% of her matches (W/L 33/22). These statistics emphasize the importance of assessing the competitive landscape relative to the event level they each have been engaged in. Their head-to-head history shows only one previous encounter where Friedsam triumphed in Poitiers, finishing with a decisive 7-6(4), 6-1 victory. The average duration of their matches has been around 1:34:0, although they haven’t experienced a deciding set yet.
When under extreme pressure, such as tiebreak situations, Friedsam has been successful, winning their single tiebreak encounter. The quality of opponents they've faced over the past year illustrates that Friedsam has played against an average rank of 341.61, whereas Tan's opponents averaged a rank of 227.83—a significant difference hinting at the varying difficulty of their respective matchups. Analyzing deciding set performance across all matches, Friedsam has emerged victorious in 60% of such situations over the last year, closely trailing Tan, who has achieved a 62% success rate.
In more recent realms like breakpoint conversion, Friedsam has capitalized on 37.2% of opportunities, whereas Tan converts 32.87% of her chances. This metric becomes crucial, especially in live betting scenarios where players face breakpoint opportunities. Based on these stats, Friedsam appears to have a slight advantage in key areas, suggesting she might be poised to win in their upcoming match.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Harmony Tan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Friedsam vs H. Tan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 20 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:58:59 | Average Match Time | 1:58:59 |
| 63% (93/148) | 1st Serve % | 63% (119/189) |
| 75% (70/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (71/119) |
| 45% (25/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (27/70) |
| 38% (12/32) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (7/14) |
| 48% (91/189) | Return Points Win % | 36% (53/148) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played
H. Tan Recent Matches Played

A. Friedsam vs H. Tan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.12% (398/264) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.48% (390/313) |
| 58.11% (896/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.41% (871/701) |
| 53.53% (7666/6656) | Games Win/Loss | 52.67% (7296/6556) |
| 55.96% (108/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.47% (131/101) |
| 59.66% (139/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.39% (130/128) |
| 67.16% (135/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.11% (110/73) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 63.33% (19/11) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1580 | Aces Total | 1107 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1697 | Total Double Faults | 1213 |
| 1:11:51 | Average Match Time | 1:13:31 |
| 464.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 489.33 |
| 65% (22415/34520) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21108/36385) |
| 65% (14620/22415) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13249/21108) |
| 46% (5568/12103) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6981/15277) |
| 45% (1711/3766) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2261/4531) |
| 43% (14576/34134) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16442/35387) |
| 36.84% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.88% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 42.62% (26/35) |
| 68.06% (211/99) | Challenger W/L | 55.80% (250/198) |
| 76.81% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (96/52) |
| 60% (389/648) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (383/677) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 10% (1/10) |
| 52% (91/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (61/118) |
| 54% (123/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (85/174) |
| 85% (391/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (394/340) |
| 14% (391/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (394/52) |
| 23% (271/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (308/49) |