Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Ruby Cooling Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 12:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Vrancken Peeters vs R. Cooling

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Peeters 1 - 0 Cooling
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters winning 2 and Ruby Cooling winning 0. The last match between Anouck Vrancken Peeters and Ruby Cooling was at the W35 Birmingham, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peeters | 1 |
| Cooling | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Birmingham(10-14-25)
A. V. Peeters vs R. Cooling H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.64% (133-90) | Career Total W/L | 26.09% (6-17) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. V. Peeters vs R. Cooling Match Preview:
- Anouck Vrancken Peeters shows a stronger capability on second serves, winning nearly 40% compared to Ruby Cooling’s 32.31% over the past six months. Could this be a decisive factor in their matchup?
- When it comes to return games, Anouck performs slightly better, capturing 52.86% of their opponent’s second serve points compared to Ruby's 51.67%. For first serve returns, Anouck also leads at 37.78% against Ruby's 34.82%.
- Pressure situations find the players closely matched, with Ruby having a marginal advantage, saving 51.35% of breakpoints, as opposed to Anouck’s 51.23%.
- A stark contrast appears in the match outcomes over the past year: Ruby Cooling has not secured a match victory, losing all five encounters, while Anouck Vrancken Peeters boasts a winning percentage of over 67%, claiming 49 victories out of 73 matches.
- On an indoor hardcourt, Ruby Cooling struggles with a 0% win rate, whereas this is Anouck’s most successful environment, winning 79% of her matches there (W/L 23/6).
- Despite facing opponents of slightly lower rank, Anouck Vrancken Peeters has a notably higher win rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 60.42% success rate compared to Ruby’s elusive victory record.
- In deciding sets, which could be vital in tightly contested matches, Anouck has a robust 68% winning record, while Ruby has yet to win a deciding set in the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
Ruby Cooling and Anouck Vrancken Peeters present contrasting recent performances as they head into this upcoming match. Anouck demonstrates a clear edge with her second serve statistics and return games, closely reflected in the match outcomes observed over the last year.
Though both players show minimal differences in handling breakpoints, Anouck's decisive advantage comes from her aptitude on her best surface, the indoor hardcourt, and her ability to close matches in deciding sets. Ruby's lack of a match win in recent form tips the scales further in favor of Anouck.
Considering these performance trends and the surface favorable to Anouck’s game, the upcoming match shows her as the likely favorite for a win against Ruby Cooling.
Anouck Vrancken Peeters vs Ruby Cooling Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. V. Peeters vs R. Cooling H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:33:1 | Average Match Time | 1:33:1 |
| 70% (44/63) | 1st Serve % | 51% (30/59) |
| 59% (26/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (9/29) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 61% (36/59) | Return Points Win % | 46% (29/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. V. Peeters Recent Matches Played
R. Cooling Recent Matches Played

A. V. Peeters vs R. Cooling Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.64% (133/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.09% (6/17) |
| 57.45% (297/220) | Sets Win/Loss | 32.73% (18/37) |
| 53.86% (2549/2184) | Games Win/Loss | 41.93% (226/313) |
| 60.27% (44/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 53.21% (58/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 77.50% (31/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 145 | Aces Total | 40 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.49 |
| 1036 | Total Double Faults | 131 |
| 1:39:46 | Average Match Time | 1:27:56 |
| 422.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.09 |
| 63% (8584/13589) | 1st Serve % | 59% (857/1449) |
| 59% (5080/8584) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (497/857) |
| 44% (2185/5005) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (228/592) |
| 52% (941/1818) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (67/129) |
| 49% (6497/13363) | Return Points Win % | 42% (570/1343) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.06% (49/40) | Challenger W/L | 26.09% (6/17) |
| 63.16% (84/49) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (132/221) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 45% (18/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 56% (41/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 88% (121/106) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (6/3) |
| 12% (121/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (6/3) |
| 25% (102/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) |