Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Cazaux vs Christopher Heyman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazaux vs Heyman analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Cazaux vs Christopher Heyman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazaux has won 53.73% of points on his second serve, while Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazaux, in recent form, has won 48.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazaux has saved 62.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazaux has won 59.72% of matches played (W/L 43/ 29), with Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14), where as Heyman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazaux has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.07 while Heyman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazaux has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazaux has converted 35.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cazaux 0 - 0 Heyman
75
Rank
74
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
64% (152-85)
Career Total W/L
64% (352-201)
65% (13-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$466,125
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Christopher Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (33/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (279/219) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 184 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.65 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (890/1496) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (686/890) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (334/606) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (59/153) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (579/1539) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Damir Dzumhur
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Arthur Cazaux
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cazaux Vs Heyman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
