Arthur Fery vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fery vs Gramaticopolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Fery vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fery has won 49.25% of points on his second serve, while Gramaticopolo has won 37.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fery, in recent form, has won 49.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gramaticopolo has won 33.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.5% and 24.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fery has saved 63.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gramaticopolo has saved 44.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fery has won 68% of matches played (W/L 34/ 16), with Gramaticopolo winning 47.22% (W/L 17/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fery has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 32/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Gramaticopolo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 21/ 9), where as Gramaticopolo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.22% of matches (W/L 17/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fery has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.36 while Gramaticopolo has played against players with an average rank of 67.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fery has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gramaticopolo has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fery has converted 41.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gramaticopolo has converted 75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fery 0 - 0 Gramaticopolo
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
265
Rank
261
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (85-51)
Career Total W/L
47% (44-49)
83% (5-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$32,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fery VS Gramaticopolo H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Arthur Fery | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 25% (2/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 62% (69/42) | 38% (32/52) |
Hard Win/Loss | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 21 | 3 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.02 |
DFs Total | 12 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:50 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 365.17 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (254/373) | 45% (18/40) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (185/254) | 33% (6/18) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (58/119) | 55% (12/22) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (21/60) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (177/385) | 25% (10/40) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Arthur Fery Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Arthur Fery
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Daniil Glinka
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF | w/o | H2H | |||
QF |
Arthur Fery
Player
Hiroki Moriya
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Salvatore Caruso
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Arthur Fery
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arthur Fery
Player
Mika Brunold
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Liam Broady
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Biagio Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Rispoli
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Harrison Adams
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Philip Henning
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more