Arthur Nagel vs Damien Wenger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Oct at 12:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nagel vs D. Wenger

FRA
2
Win
Played
1
Win

SUI
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nagel 2 - 1 Wenger
They have played 7 sets in total, with Arthur Nagel winning 4 and Damien Wenger winning 3. The last match between Arthur Nagel and Damien Wenger was at the M15 Villers-les-Nancy, 17-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nagel | 2 |
| Wenger | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Villers-les-Nancy(10-17-25)
(R2) M15 Alaminos(03-27-25)
(QF) M15 Alaminos(03-14-25)
A. Nagel vs D. Wenger H2H Profile
A. Nagel vs D. Wenger Match Preview:
- In recent months, Damien Wenger has outperformed Arthur Nagel on second serve points, winning 45.48% compared to Nagel's 42.86%. Is this an advantage for Wenger? It certainly suggests so.
- Wenger also leads in return game stats, claiming 46.54% of opponents' second serve points over Nagel's 43.73%, and 32.29% on first serve returns over Nagel's 27.55%.
- Under pressure, Wenger has slightly better breakpoint-saving stats at 50.36% versus Nagel’s 48.74%, potentially giving him a psychological edge.
- The win-loss records reveal close competition, with Wenger at 65.96% (31/16) and Nagel at 63.33% (38/22) over the last year, making their current form closely matched.
- Both players prefer clay surfaces, boasting a 66% career win rate on this surface. Could this make their head-to-head particularly intriguing on clay?
- Wenger has played mostly Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events in the past year, achieving a 69.77% win rate, slightly higher than Nagel’s 63.79% in similar events.
- Their head-to-head history is tied, each winning once in their past encounters. Yet, Wenger has a slight edge winning three sets to Nagel’s two.
- The average opponent rank these players faced is nearly identical, suggesting evenly matched competition analysis-wise.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Nagel holds a higher success rate, winning 60% compared to Wenger’s 50% in the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating second serve and return game stats, Damien Wenger appears to have a marginal edge over Arthur Nagel. Wenger’s slightly superior performance in these areas, coupled with his ability to save breakpoints, indicates his solidity under pressure.
Their similar overall win rates highlight their evenly matched competition level, but Wenger’s marginally better success rate in their respective events might suggest a slight advantage.
However, with the match potentially going to a deciding set, Arthur Nagel’s higher success rate in these scenarios could play a significant role.
Considering these elements and their surface preference, the matchup remains tightly contested. Nonetheless, Damien Wenger’s consistent performance statistics seem to narrowly position him as the probable victor for the upcoming match.
Arthur Nagel vs Damien Wenger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nagel vs D. Wenger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 37 | Games Won | 33 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:45:32 | Average Match Time | 1:45:32 |
| 74% (135/183) | 1st Serve % | 65% (121/186) |
| 66% (89/135) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (81/121) |
| 52% (25/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (36/65) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (9/17) |
| 37% (69/186) | Return Points Win % | 38% (69/183) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played
D. Wenger Recent Matches Played

A. Nagel vs D. Wenger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.16% (96/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.92% (303/171) |
| 59.94% (208/139) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.34% (652/411) |
| 54.50% (1769/1477) | Games Win/Loss | 55.11% (5325/4338) |
| 80.00% (8/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.33% (16/14) |
| 65.82% (52/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.97% (283/146) |
| 57.14% (36/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26.67% (4/11) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 435 | Aces Total | 749 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 311 | Total Double Faults | 1165 |
| 1:19:25 | Average Match Time | 1:29:7 |
| 342.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 443.34 |
| 65% (5537/8525) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15442/25617) |
| 67% (3692/5537) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (10227/15442) |
| 50% (1506/2988) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4914/10176) |
| 43% (367/845) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1510/3142) |
| 40% (3324/8261) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11717/26183) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 54.84% (34/28) |
| 63.33% (95/55) | Futures W/L | 65.77% (269/140) |
| 63% (94/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (297/467) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 49% (17/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (50/100) |
| 59% (26/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (68/118) |
| 88% (95/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (277/259) |
| 12% (95/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (277/18) |
| 20% (56/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (197/44) |