Ashley Lahey vs Claudia Ferrer Perez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Aug at 08:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lahey vs C. Ferrer Perez

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lahey 1 - 0 Perez
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ashley Lahey winning 2 and Claudia Ferrer Perez winning 0. The last match between Ashley Lahey and Claudia Ferrer Perez was at the W15 Logrono, 23-08-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Ashley Lahey getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lahey | 1 |
| Perez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) W15 Logrono(08-23-25)
A. Lahey vs C. F. Perez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.43% (156-111) | Career Total W/L | 52.38% (44-40) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Lahey vs C. F. Perez Match Preview:
- Second serve performance has been slightly stronger for Lahey, who wins 39.48% of points compared to Perez's 36.69%. This could be crucial in determining match outcomes.
- In terms of return games, Perez excels by winning 52.35% of opponents' second serve points, while Lahey wins 49.38%. Similarly, Perez is more effective on first serve returns, with 34.47% compared to Lahey's 32.27%.
- Under pressure, Lahey has an edge, saving 49.81% of breakpoints while Perez manages 42.36%, which could prove decisive in tight match situations.
- Overall match performance in the last year reveals Lahey has a stronger winning percentage at 65.63% versus Perez's 55.1%.
- Perez performs best on Hard surfaces with a 53% win rate, whereas Lahey excels on Clay, winning 60% of matches.
- When considering tournament levels, Perez dominates Futures/Satellites/ITF events, winning 60%, while Lahey performs well at the higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 62.07%.
- Both players have faced similar levels of competition, with Perez's opponents averaging a rank of 373.73 and Lahey's at 390.66.
- If the match requires a deciding set, Lahey has the upper hand, winning 67% of these sets compared to Perez, who wins 40%.
- Perez has been more successful in converting break points recently, achieving a 42.06% conversion rate against Lahey's 38.22%.
Editorial Prediction (August 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance patterns, Lahey's slight superiority in second serve points indicates potential control over key rallies. Their ability to save breakpoints at a higher rate further consolidates this advantage.
Perez, however, outshines in returning games, particularly against opponents' second serves, and demonstrates stronger break point conversions, showcasing resilience and aggressive return play.
Given Lahey's excellent deciding set performance and overall higher match win percentage, they hold a nuanced yet significant edge. The slightly tougher competition faced by Perez suggests room for surprise, but based on stats, Lahey is the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Ashley Lahey vs Claudia Ferrer Perez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Lahey vs C. F. Perez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:33:18 | Average Match Time | 1:33:18 |
| 71% (51/72) | 1st Serve % | 73% (37/51) |
| 73% (37/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 33% (7/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
| 49% (25/51) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Lahey Recent Matches Played
C. F. Perez Recent Matches Played

A. Lahey vs C. F. Perez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.43% (156/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.38% (44/40) |
| 56.91% (354/268) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.06% (96/92) |
| 52.40% (3071/2790) | Games Win/Loss | 50.17% (882/876) |
| 59.88% (97/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 60.23% (53/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 533 | Aces Total | 93 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 584 | Total Double Faults | 173 |
| 1:35:24 | Average Match Time | 1:7:48 |
| 524.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.82 |
| 69% (11012/16067) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2140/3510) |
| 63% (6899/11012) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1296/2140) |
| 48% (2411/5055) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (589/1370) |
| 45% (840/1861) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (190/396) |
| 43% (7011/16251) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1541/3492) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.87% (147/107) | Challenger W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 75.00% (9/3) | Futures W/L | 59.68% (37/25) |
| 58% (151/260) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (43/83) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (26/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 51% (46/91) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 83% (155/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (46/39) |
| 17% (155/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (46/7) |
| 25% (112/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (38/5) |