Austin Karosi vs Roy Hobbs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Karosi vs Hobbs analysis and find out who is favored!
Austin Karosi vs Roy Hobbs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Karosi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hobbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Karosi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hobbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Karosi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hobbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Karosi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hobbs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Karosi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 69/ 125).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Karosi has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hobbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Karosi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hobbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Karosi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hobbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Karosi 0 - 0 Hobbs
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
25% (13-39)
Career Total W/L
36% (76-133)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Austin Karosi | Roy Hobbs |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Austin Karosi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Austin Karosi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Roy Hobbs Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Roy Hobbs
100%
(
93 of
93)
1st Serve %
100%
(
83 of
83)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kazuma Kawachi
Player
Roy Hobbs
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Roy Hobbs
44%
(
31 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Blake Bayldon
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Minhtuan Pham
Player
Roy Hobbs
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roy Hobbs
Player
Muhammad Hidayatul Rezky Djufri
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Issei Okamura
Player
Roy Hobbs
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Anapat Timangkul
Player
Roy Hobbs
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more