Ben Jones vs Arthur Nagel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Oct at 12:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Jones vs A. Nagel

GBR
0
Win
Played
2
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Jones 0 - 2 Nagel
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ben Jones winning 1 and Arthur Nagel winning 4. The last match between Arthur Nagel and Ben Jones was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 24-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Draw getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jones | 0 |
| Nagel | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Sarreguemines(10-24-25)
(Q3) M15 Forbach(09-26-22)
B. Jones vs A. Nagel H2H Profile
B. Jones vs A. Nagel Match Preview:
- How does second-serve performance compare between the players? Ben Jones has an edge, winning 51.25% of second-serve points, compared to Arthur Nagel's 43.81%.
- For return game stats in recent form, Jones and Nagel are quite similar on second serve returns, with Nagel slightly ahead at 42.86% to Jones's 42.74%.
- Arthur Nagel has a stronger first-serve return winning 26.62% compared to Ben Jones at 22.60%.
- Does saving breakpoints show a difference? Jones saves 57.05% of breakpoints, outperforming Nagel, who saves 49.42%.
- In terms of match outcomes over the past year, Arthur Nagel leads with a 63.33% win rate, while Ben Jones has won 44.90% of matches.
- Which player has a better surface performance? Jones’s best career win percentage is 51% on I.hard, while Nagel boasts a 51% win rate on clay.
- Both players have competed primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Nagel securing a higher win rate at 63.79% compared to Jones's 46.34%.
- Direct head-to-head shows Nagel with a clear lead, having won their only match along with both sets played against Jones.
- The average opponent rank for Jones is higher at 388.86 compared to Nagel's 430.88 over the past year.
- In deciding sets, Jones is slightly more successful, winning 63% of them against Nagel's 56% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 24, 2025, UTC):
The analysis of both players reveals some intriguing contrasts in performance and strengths. Ben Jones demonstrates a slight edge in second-serve performance and has been more effective at saving breakpoints in recent form. Meanwhile, Arthur Nagel exhibits superior first-serve return stats and holds an overall stronger match win percentage over the last year.
Moreover, while Jones has the advantage in deciding sets, Nagel's overall record, surface adaptability, and past head-to-head victory grant him a competitive edge in this upcoming clash. Past head-to-head results show Nagel dominating their previous encounter, further building his case as the favorite.
Considering these factors and performance patterns, Arthur Nagel is the most likely winner in this tennis match-up. His consistency over time and ability to respond under various match conditions make him the favorite to prevail once again.
Ben Jones vs Arthur Nagel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Jones vs A. Nagel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 31 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:11:22 | Average Match Time | 2:11:22 |
| 68% (115/170) | 1st Serve % | 64% (125/194) |
| 81% (93/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (88/125) |
| 44% (24/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (43/69) |
| 24% (4/17) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 32% (63/194) | Return Points Win % | 31% (53/170) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Jones Recent Matches Played
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played

B. Jones vs A. Nagel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.13% (170/176) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.90% (91/56) |
| 49.62% (390/396) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.10% (198/137) |
| 50.96% (3955/3806) | Games Win/Loss | 54.28% (1700/1432) |
| 47.37% (72/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.82% (52/27) |
| 53.93% (96/82) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (36/27) |
| 16.67% (2/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2011 | Aces Total | 422 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 943 | Total Double Faults | 300 |
| 1:16:22 | Average Match Time | 1:18:44 |
| 352.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.8 |
| 68% (11745/17394) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5304/8183) |
| 74% (8669/11745) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3538/5304) |
| 49% (2745/5649) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1448/2879) |
| 38% (503/1328) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (349/804) |
| 34% (6123/17755) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3181/7923) |
| 37.50% (9/15) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 50.00% (161/161) | Futures W/L | 62.07% (90/55) |
| 49% (168/342) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (89/145) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 41% (59/144) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 47% (46/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 80% (182/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (90/79) |
| 19% (182/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (90/11) |
| 14% (164/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (56/11) |