Ben Patael vs Mikel LOPEZ Hernaez Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patael vs Hernaez analysis and find out who is favored!
Ben Patael vs Mikel LOPEZ Hernaez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patael has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hernaez has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patael, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hernaez has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patael has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hernaez has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patael has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Hernaez winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Hernaez has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Hernaez has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patael has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Hernaez has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patael has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hernaez has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patael has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hernaez has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patael 0 - 0 Hernaez
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ben Patael | Mikel LOPEZ Hernaez |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Mikel LOPEZ Hernaez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Mikel Lopez Hernaez
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mikel Lopez Hernaez
Player
Adria Vallejo Ferrer
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Miguel Damas
Player
Mikel Lopez Hernaez
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alberto Colas Sanchez
Player
Mikel Lopez Hernaez
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more