Benjamin Hassan vs Flemming Peters Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hassan vs Peters analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Hassan vs Flemming Peters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hassan has won 51.39% of points on his second serve, while Peters has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hassan, in recent form, has won 49.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peters has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hassan has saved 64.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peters has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hassan has won 59.52% of matches played (W/L 50/ 34), with Peters winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 170/ 99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Peters has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 148/ 128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.19% of matches (W/L 41/ 26), where as Peters has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hassan winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Hassan winning 4 and Peters winning 0. The last match between Hassan and Peters was at the Germany F6, 04-07-2016, Q3, Clay with Benjamin Hassan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hassan and Peters have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hassan winning 0 times and Peters 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hassan winning 1, and Peters 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hassan has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.94 while Peters has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hassan has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peters has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hassan has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peters has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hassan 2 - 0 Peters
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
156
Rank
149
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (274-178)
Career Total W/L
53% (168-152)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$110,475
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benjamin Hassan | Flemming Peters |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 26 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(2) | |||||
7-5 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Hassan | Flemming Peters |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (17/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (189/186) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.41 | 0 |
Aces Total | 75 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:9 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 297.59 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (608/1059) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (432/608) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (240/451) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (31/87) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (393/1065) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Billy Harris
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Benjamin Hassan
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Benjamin Hassan
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Billy Harris
Player
Benjamin Hassan
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
86 of
125)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
10
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
51 of
65)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
43 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(3) 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Benjamin Hassan
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
14
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 4 | 1-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Flemming Peters Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
George Houghton
Player
Flemming Peters
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Shendrit Deari
Player
Flemming Peters
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 0-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 7-5 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H |
view more