Berfu Cengiz vs Jana Fett Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Sep at 11:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Cengiz vs J. Fett

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cengiz 1 - 0 Fett
They have played 2 sets in total, with Berfu Cengiz winning 2 and Jana Fett winning 0. The last match between Berfu Cengiz and Jana Fett was at the Samsun Open - Samsun, 29-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cengiz | 1 |
| Fett | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Samsun Open - Samsun(09-29-25)
B. Cengiz vs J. Fett H2H Profile
B. Cengiz vs J. Fett Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Berfu Cengiz has a slight edge over Jana Fett, winning 38.29% of second serve points compared to Fett's 36.86%. Could this marginal difference impact the outcome?
- Return Game Efficacy: Jana Fett excels in returning opponents' second serves, capturing 58.53% of points versus Cengiz's 56.19%. This suggests Fett might capitalize on Cengiz's second serves more effectively.
- First Serve Returns: Fett continues to lead with a 34.90% success rate on first serve returns, while Cengiz follows with 31.74%. Stronger return stats favor Fett in this head-to-head.
- Pressure Situations: Fett displays better resilience by saving 45.02% of breakpoints, contrasted with Cengiz's 42.19%. Who handles pressure better?
- Overall Performance: Fett has a higher win rate over the past year at 52.50%, compared to Cengiz's 34.78%. This could hint at better recent form for Fett.
- Surface Strength: Fett's best performance is on indoor hard courts, with a 63% win rate, whereas Cengiz excels on clay with 64%. The playing surface could thus influence the match heavily.
- Tournament Level: Cengiz slightly outperforms Fett in Challenger/ITF events, with a 38.89% win rate compared to Fett's 35.71%. How does the tournament level affect predictions?
- Quality of Opponents: Fett has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 192.3, compared to Cengiz’s 364.17. This might give Fett a competitive advantage.
- Deciding Set Performance: Should the match reach a deciding set, Fett stands out with a 47% win rate over Cengiz's 13%. This statistic is crucial for predicting tight matches.
- Event-Specific Form: Current event performance could also be decisive, highlighting any recent form shifts in either player's game.
Editorial Prediction (September 29, 2025, UTC):
Recent statistics reveal Jana Fett's slight advantage in second serve returns and breakpoint-saving ability, which could prove pivotal in this matchup.
Moreover, Fett's higher winning percentage over the past year paired with her familiarity against stronger-ranked opponents gives her an edge.
The match's outcome could hinge on their performance under pressure and Fett's precedent in deciding sets hints that she could outlast Cengiz if it goes the distance.
Considering the analyzed data, Jana Fett appears to be the more likely victor in the upcoming tennis encounter.
Berfu Cengiz vs Jana Fett Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Cengiz vs J. Fett H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:53:19 | Average Match Time | 1:53:19 |
| 60% (55/92) | 1st Serve % | 54% (45/84) |
| 69% (38/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (31/45) |
| 41% (15/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (14/39) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 46% (39/84) | Return Points Win % | 42% (39/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Cengiz Recent Matches Played
J. Fett Recent Matches Played

B. Cengiz vs J. Fett Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.19% (270/194) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.73% (380/267) |
| 56.07% (600/470) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.39% (858/637) |
| 52.48% (5071/4592) | Games Win/Loss | 53.64% (7286/6298) |
| 52.74% (77/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.79% (103/85) |
| 63.92% (124/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.53% (127/90) |
| 56.10% (69/54) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.37% (128/74) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.00% (22/18) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 476 | Aces Total | 1162 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
| 1459 | Total Double Faults | 3129 |
| 1:21:27 | Average Match Time | 1:19:19 |
| 521.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.99 |
| 62% (17219/27973) | 1st Serve % | 57% (20256/35468) |
| 59% (10232/17219) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (12899/20256) |
| 45% (4847/10755) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (6631/15212) |
| 49% (1898/3843) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2305/4726) |
| 48% (13573/28521) | Return Points Win % | 47% (16714/35417) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 50.94% (27/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Main Tour W/L | 56.12% (78/61) |
| 55.65% (187/149) | Challenger W/L | 59.83% (213/143) |
| 71.84% (74/29) | Futures W/L | 73.08% (57/21) |
| 58% (263/455) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (376/631) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 51% (44/86) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (54/124) |
| 56% (81/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (114/214) |
| 85% (251/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (382/327) |
| 14% (251/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (382/53) |
| 25% (213/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (264/53) |