Biagio Gramaticopolo vs Gillian Osmont Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gramaticopolo vs Osmont analysis and find out who is favored!
Biagio Gramaticopolo vs Gillian Osmont Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gramaticopolo has won 43.1% of points on his second serve, while Osmont has won 36.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gramaticopolo, in recent form, has won 44.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Osmont has won 36.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.93% and 26.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gramaticopolo has saved 47.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Osmont has saved 22.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gramaticopolo has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 18/ 20), with Osmont winning 16.67% (W/L 1/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gramaticopolo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Osmont has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 10/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gramaticopolo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 18/ 20), where as Osmont has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gramaticopolo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gramaticopolo winning 2 and Osmont winning 0. The last match between Gramaticopolo and Osmont was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 12-10-2021, Q2 round, Hard with Biagio Gramaticopolo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gramaticopolo and Osmont have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gramaticopolo winning 0 times and Osmont 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gramaticopolo winning 0, and Osmont 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gramaticopolo has played against opponents with an average rank of 75.58 while Osmont has played against players with an average rank of 48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gramaticopolo has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Osmont has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gramaticopolo has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Osmont has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gramaticopolo 1 - 0 Osmont
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
47% (45-51)
Career Total W/L
28% (11-29)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gramaticopolo VS Osmont H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Biagio Gramaticopolo | Gillian Osmont |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gramaticopolo VS Osmont H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Biagio Gramaticopolo | Gillian Osmont |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 29% (4/10) | 22% (2/7) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (61/85) | 36% (32/57) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 4 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.07 |
DFs Total | 10 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 74.5 | 72 |
1st Serve % | 55% (108/198) | 52% (23/44) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (62/108) | 43% (10/23) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (42/90) | 24% (5/21) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (6/15) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (65/186) | 40% (21/53) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 17% (1/5) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Biagio Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Rispoli
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Harrison Adams
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Gillian Osmont Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 3-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Gillian Osmont
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Hammond
Player
Gillian Osmont
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sam Thompson
Player
Gillian Osmont
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kaito Uesugi
Player
Gillian Osmont
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Gillian Osmont
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rhys Searant
Player
Gillian Osmont
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 13-11 | H2H |
view more