Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bjorn Fratangelo vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fratangelo vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Bjorn Fratangelo vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fratangelo has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 49.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fratangelo, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fratangelo has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 66.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fratangelo has won 37.5% of matches played (W/L 3/ 5), with Nava winning 61.84% (W/L 47/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fratangelo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 179/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 61/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Fratangelo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.22% of matches (W/L 30/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fratangelo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fratangelo winning 2 and Nava winning 0. The last match between Fratangelo and Nava was at the Knoxville Challenger, 12-11-2021, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Bjorn Fratangelo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fratangelo and Nava have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fratangelo winning 0 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fratangelo winning 0, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fratangelo has played against opponents with an average rank of 279 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 276.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fratangelo has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fratangelo has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 38.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fratangelo 1 - 0 Nava
794
Rank
99
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (401-270)
Career Total W/L
60% (169-112)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$948,485
Career Prize Money
$402,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fratangelo VS Nava H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Bjorn Fratangelo | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:58 | 1:9:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) | 73% (49/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (26/31) | 65% (32/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 74% (14/19) | 56% (10/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (25/67) | 20% (10/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Fratangelo VS Nava H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Emilio Nava
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bjorn Fratangelo | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (294/261) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 206 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 252.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (1132/1772) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (829/1132) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (323/640) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (57/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (602/1691) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (15/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Bjorn Fratangelo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
83)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 3-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Steve Johnson
60%
(
71 of
118)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
126)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
38 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(6) 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Emilio Nava
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fratangelo Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emilio Nava
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
