Blaise Bicknell vs Cooper Woestendick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent form, Woestendick outperforms Bicknell on second serve points, winning 49.4% compared to Bicknell's 40.53%.
• Bicknell excels in return games, capturing 46.35% of opponent second serve points, in comparison to Woestendick's 42.65%.
• When facing first serves, Bicknell again performs better, winning 33.37% of points against Woestendick's 28.11%.
• Who handles pressure better? Bicknell edges out slightly by saving 51.52% of breakpoints compared to Woestendick's 51.28%.
• Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Woestendick has a higher win percentage at 54.55% as opposed to Bicknell's 45.83%.
• Bicknell's strongest surface is Hard courts with a 61% win rate, but struggles on Indoor Hard with just 20% wins. Meanwhile, Woestendick thrives on Indoor Hard with a 67% win rate but has only 50% on Hard courts.
• In recent tournaments, Bicknell tends to compete at higher-tier events (Challengers/ITF >$10K) but has a lower win rate of 38.46%, contrasted with Woestendick's 50% success at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events.
• Bicknell has faced more challenging opponents, with an average ranking of 349.38 compared to Woestendick's opponents averaging a rank of 472.18.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Bicknell has the advantage, winning 29% of these sets, whereas Woestendick has not won any of their deciding sets recently.
• Woestendick converts break points slightly better, 42.31% to Bicknell's 37.82%, which could be influential in close games.

Editorial Prediction (July 5, 2025, UTC):

As we examine the matchup between Bicknell and Woestendick, key statistics reveal insights into their potential performance in the impending match.

Bicknell demonstrates a superior ability to capitalize on return games, especially on second serve returns, making them a formidable opponent when challenging for points. Moreover, Bicknell's slight edge in saving breakpoints and his performance in deciding sets could offer crucial advantages in high-pressure scenarios.

Conversely, Woestendick has shown stronger second serve performance and a more consistent record in break point conversions, which may contribute to gaining an upper hand during tight moments in the match.

Considering these elements, along with Woestendick's higher match win rate and superior performance on their preferred surface, the data slightly favors them. Thus, Woestendick is the predicted winner for the upcoming tennis match.