Blaise Bicknell vs Dan Martin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 03:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Bicknell vs D. Martin

JAM
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Martin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Blaise Bicknell winning 2 and Dan Martin winning 0. The last match between Blaise Bicknell and Dan Martin was at the M25 Laval, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Blaise Bicknell getting the victory 6-2 1-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bicknell | 1 |
| Martin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Laval(07-03-25)
B. Bicknell vs D. Martin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $23,760 |
| 56.94% (119-90) | Career Total W/L | 50.50% (101-99) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
B. Bicknell vs D. Martin Match Preview:
- How do they perform on their second serves recently? Bicknell has a success rate of 40.83%, which trails behind Martin's 43.19%.
- Who excels more in return games? Bicknell is slightly better, winning 46.65% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Martin's 45.74%.
- First serve return stats show Bicknell has a clear edge, converting 33.25% compared to Martin's 26.87%.
- Under pressure, who is more reliable? Martin leads in breakpoint saves, saving 55.42% while Bicknell saves 51.87%.
- What about overall match performance in the last year? Martin leads here with a 54.41% win rate against Bicknell's 41.67%.
- In terms of preferred surface, Bicknell fares best on Hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Hard courts aren't Martin's preferred surface.
- Who typically faces tougher opponents? Bicknell's opponents average a rank of 331.25, superior to the 385.57 faced by Martin.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Martin holds an advantage with a 53% success rate, considerably higher than Bicknell's 29%.
- Is there a noteworthy difference in breakpoint conversion? Yes, Bicknell outperforms here, converting 40% of opportunities, more than Martin's 32.14%.
- Lastly, Martin appears more seasoned on the futures and satellite circuits with a 54.9% win rate, compared to Bicknell's 38.46% against comparable competition.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Bicknell enters the match with a stronger return game, an area that may tip critical points in their favor. The higher breakpoint conversion rate further underscores this advantage, suggesting Bicknell could capitalize when under pressure.
Conversely, Martin shows strength in consistent match performance, saving break points more effectively and showing resilience in deciding sets. This indicates a degree of tenacity that could prove decisive in a tightly-contested encounter.
Bicknell's comfort on Hard courts contrasts with Martin's premier form on Clay, positing a scenario where the surface might play a pivotal role. Considering all factors, including both recent trends and career performance metrics, Martin holds a slight edge and is likely to emerge victorious.
Blaise Bicknell vs Dan Martin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Bicknell vs D. Martin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 7 | Games Won | 2 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:45:20 | Average Match Time | 0:45:20 |
| 64% (18/28) | 1st Serve % | 68% (19/28) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (2/9) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (15/28) | Return Points Win % | 25% (7/28) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
D. Martin Recent Matches Played

B. Bicknell vs D. Martin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.94% (119/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.50% (101/99) |
| 55.95% (268/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.01% (227/218) |
| 51.99% (2357/2177) | Games Win/Loss | 51.73% (2143/2000) |
| 61.54% (80/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.48% (48/49) |
| 52.05% (38/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.17% (32/26) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.73% (21/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 540 | Aces Total | 408 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 642 | Total Double Faults | 380 |
| 1:25:30 | Average Match Time | 1:24:59 |
| 426.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 388.13 |
| 65% (8104/12501) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6549/10569) |
| 68% (5471/8104) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4365/6549) |
| 50% (2203/4396) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1993/4020) |
| 44% (504/1157) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (405/995) |
| 39% (4798/12212) | Return Points Win % | 38% (3949/10282) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (36/40) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (18/30) |
| 63.78% (81/46) | Futures W/L | 55.03% (82/67) |
| 57% (114/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (99/196) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (32/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/52) |
| 50% (34/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 82% (121/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (105/90) |
| 18% (121/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (105/15) |
| 23% (88/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (95/11) |