Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blake Ellis vs Timo Legout Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ellis vs Legout analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Ellis vs Timo Legout Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ellis has won 52.05% of points on his second serve, while Legout has won 47.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ellis, in recent form, has won 51.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Legout has won 57.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.25% and 35.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ellis has saved 58.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Legout has saved 58.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ellis has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 51/ 30), with Legout winning 63.64% (W/L 14/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ellis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 10/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 162/ 128). Legout has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 56/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Ellis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.55% of matches (W/L 37/ 14), where as Legout has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ellis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ellis winning 2 and Legout winning 0. The last match between Ellis and Legout was at the M25 Saint Dizier, 02-11-2021, First, I.hard with Blake Ellis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ellis and Legout have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ellis winning 0 times and Legout 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ellis winning 0, and Legout 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ellis has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.31 while Legout has played against players with an average rank of 196.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ellis has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Legout has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ellis has converted 43.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Legout has converted 54.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ellis 1 - 0 Legout
394
Rank
348
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
688
Rank
406
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
58% (207-152)
Career Total W/L
58% (87-62)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
80% (4-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blake Ellis | Timo Legout |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (44/58) | 60% (45/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (34/44) | 62% (28/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (9/14) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (35/75) | 26% (15/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Blake Ellis
Player
Timo Legout
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Ellis | Timo Legout |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 80% (4/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (30/24) | 62% (8/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (289/249) | 56% (72/57) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 80% (4/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 174 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:37 | 1:59:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.08 | 219.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (980/1529) | 62% (253/409) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (731/980) | 68% (171/253) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (282/549) | 47% (74/156) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (65/155) | 55% (24/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (596/1570) | 44% (171/386) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (10/4) | 80% (4/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 80% (4/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (1/0) |
Blake Ellis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Duckhee Lee
Player
Blake Ellis
56%
(
70 of
126)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
113)
1
Aces
16
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
54 of
67)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
45 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Yunseok Jang
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
62%
(
77 of
124)
1st Serve %
67%
(
84 of
125)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
51%
(
63 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Ellis
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
14
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
6
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
53 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
10
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Blake Bayldon
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
24 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Jarrod Joyce
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Timo Legout Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Ethan Quinn
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Niccolo Baroni
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Timo Legout
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Jeremy Jahn
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
22%
(
5 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ellis Vs Legout Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
