Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blake Mott vs Liam Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Mott vs Liam Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 44.81% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 51.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.05% and 30.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 61.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Broady winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mott winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mott winning 0 and Broady winning 4. The last match between Mott and Broady was at the Launceston Challenger, 06-02-2020, Third, Hard with Liam Broady getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mott and Broady have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mott winning 0 times and Broady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mott winning 0, and Broady 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.16 while Broady has played against players with an average rank of 286.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 42.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 43.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mott 0 - 2 Broady
411
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
149
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (215-161)
Career Total W/L
58% (470-343)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blake Mott | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 16 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:38 | 0:49:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (54/76) | 71% (46/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (38/54) | 78% (36/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 68% (13/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 25% (16/65) | 34% (26/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Mott | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (138/130) | 52% (101/93) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:10 | 1:34:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.23 | 207.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (455/707) | 60% (373/619) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (339/455) | 71% (263/373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (107/252) | 49% (121/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (31/75) | 41% (27/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (297/749) | 40% (249/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jannik Opitz
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ajeet Rai
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Blake Mott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mott Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
