Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Borna Coric vs Sam Querrey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Coric vs Querrey analysis and find out who is favored!
Borna Coric vs Sam Querrey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coric has won 48.22% of points on his second serve, while Querrey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coric, in recent form, has won 51.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Querrey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coric has saved 62.81% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Querrey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coric has won 55.1% of matches played (W/L 27/ 22), with Querrey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 102/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Querrey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 81/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 67/ 73).
- Player level: In the last year, Coric has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10), where as Querrey has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Coric winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Coric winning 3 and Querrey winning 4. The last match between Coric and Querrey was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 20-01-2020, First, Hard with Sam Querrey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coric and Querrey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Coric winning 0 times and Querrey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Coric winning 1, and Querrey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coric has played against opponents with an average rank of 121.29 while Querrey has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coric has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Querrey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coric has converted 37.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Querrey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Coric 1 - 1 Querrey
32
Rank
12
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
529
Rank
11
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (320-224)
Career Total W/L
56% (483-375)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,822,605
Career Prize Money
$7,761,555
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Borna Coric | Sam Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 30 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 34 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:52:0 | 0:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (125/208) | 63% (115/184) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (82/125) | 78% (90/115) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (50/83) | 59% (41/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (53/184) | 37% (76/208) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Sam Querrey
Player
Borna Coric
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
18
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-3 0-6 6-3 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Sam Querrey
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
6
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
65%
(
30 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
45 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Borna Coric | Sam Querrey |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (24/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (228/220) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 126 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (885/1418) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (638/885) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (257/533) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (52/137) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (581/1500) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Borna Coric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Borna Coric
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Borna Coric
42%
(
27 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Alexander Bublik
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Borna Coric
47%
(
53 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
69 of
123)
9
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
53%
(
32 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Sebastian Ofner
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Borna Coric
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
13
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
19
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Holger Rune
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Flavio Cobolli
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sam Querrey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Sam Querrey
58%
(
74 of
128)
1st Serve %
61%
(
88 of
145)
13
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
18
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
68 of
88)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
17 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
60 of
145)
147
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Sam Querrey
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
19 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Sam Querrey
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
6
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
37 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
100%
(
38 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
24%
(
20 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
19 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Robin Haase
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Coric Vs Querrey Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
