Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Borna Gojo vs Tim Van Rijthoven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gojo vs Rijthoven analysis and find out who is favored!
Borna Gojo vs Tim Van Rijthoven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gojo has won 52.59% of points on his second serve, while Rijthoven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gojo, in recent form, has won 45.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rijthoven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gojo has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijthoven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gojo has won 58.54% of matches played (W/L 24/ 17), with Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 117/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Gojo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8), where as Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gojo winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gojo winning 4 and Rijthoven winning 0. The last match between Gojo and Rijthoven was at the Shenzhen Challenger, 29-10-2019, First, Hard with Borna Gojo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gojo and Rijthoven have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gojo winning 0 times and Rijthoven 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gojo winning 1, and Rijthoven 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gojo has played against opponents with an average rank of 196.78 while Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gojo has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gojo has converted 25.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gojo 2 - 0 Rijthoven
135
Rank
72
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
871
Rank
101
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
59% (229-159)
Career Total W/L
62% (234-141)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$581,225
Career Prize Money
$499,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Borna Gojo | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:19 | 1:8:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (67/115) | 58% (65/112) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (53/67) | 68% (44/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (33/48) | 47% (22/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (46/112) | 25% (29/115) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Borna Gojo
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Borna Gojo | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (21/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.88 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 388 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (93/152) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (63/93) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (29/59) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 30% (43/143) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Borna Gojo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
12
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tommy Paul
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Aslan Karatsev
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Gojo
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
76%
(
72 of
95)
18
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
54 of
72)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
39 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Borna Gojo
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Frances Tiafoe
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
88%
(
67 of
76)
14
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Borna Gojo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
12
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
8
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gojo Vs Rijthoven Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
