Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jesse Huta Galung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Galung analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jesse Huta Galung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 50.07% of points on his second serve, while Galung has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Galung has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Galung has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Galung winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Galung has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 245/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Galung has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Galung winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Galung was at the Netherlands F7, 04-09-2016, Final, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Galung have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Galung 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Galung 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.33 while Galung has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Galung has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Galung has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Galung
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
91
High
38
Age
R
Plays
29
Total
0
Mast
10
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
19
Minor
Form
63% (327-193)
Career Total W/L
60% (455-304)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,840,375
Career Prize Money
$182,886
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Galung H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Jesse Huta Galung |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
Games Won | 21 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (101/168) | 52% (67/128) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (66/101) | 76% (51/67) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (29/67) | 57% (35/61) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 42% (8/19) |
Return Points W% | 33% (42/128) | 43% (73/168) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Zandschulp VS Galung H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o | |||||
1-6 6-3 6-4 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
78)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
7-5 6-3 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Jesse Huta Galung |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 36% (15/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (191/231) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
Aces Total | 89 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 57 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 182.95 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (848/1344) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (573/848) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (234/496) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (39/114) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (486/1321) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Jesse Huta Galung Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Ruben Konings
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
1 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Shunsuke Wakita
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Alexandre Muller
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Germain Gigounon
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Adrian Bodmer
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesse Huta Galung
Player
Jakob Sude
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
70 of
96)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
46 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
52 of
70)
69%
(
25 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
16 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Jesse Huta Galung
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more