Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Mackenzie McDonald Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs McDonald analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Mackenzie McDonald Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while McDonald has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while McDonald has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McDonald has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with McDonald winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). McDonald has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14), where as McDonald has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.86 while McDonald has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McDonald has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and McDonald has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 0 - 0 McDonald
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS McDonald H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Mackenzie McDonald |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (147/178) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.52 | N/A |
Aces Total | 82 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.24 | N/A |
DFs Total | 38 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:19 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 200.29 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 64% (630/990) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 70% (438/630) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (175/360) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (26/72) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 35% (348/1000) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | N/A |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Leandro Riedi
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Mackenzie McDonald Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
58%
(
83 of
143)
1st Serve %
67%
(
78 of
117)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
50%
(
30 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
39%
(
56 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
117)
132
Total Points Won
128
|
6-3 1-6 3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
19 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
94)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
35 of
43)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tommy Paul
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Corentin Moutet
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more