Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Marek Gengel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Gengel analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Marek Gengel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.66% of points on his second serve, while Gengel has won 53.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 50.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gengel has won 55.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.92% and 35.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gengel has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 44% of matches played (W/L 22/ 28), with Gengel winning 59.26% (W/L 32/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 200/ 107), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 40% of matches (W/L 10/ 15), where as Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.11% of matches (W/L 32/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Gengel winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Gengel was at the Prague II Challenger, 25-08-2020, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Gengel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Gengel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Gengel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.02 while Gengel has played against players with an average rank of 135.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gengel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gengel has converted 44.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Gengel
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
521
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
63% (326-193)
Career Total W/L
57% (301-230)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
76% (25-8)
$2,830,210
Career Prize Money
$3,280
0
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Gengel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Marek Gengel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:16:25 | 1:16:25 |
1st Serve % | 56% (40/72) | 68% (34/50) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (32/40) | 47% (16/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (13/32) | 50% (8/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 11% (1/9) |
Return Points W% | 52% (26/50) | 38% (27/72) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Gengel H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Marek Gengel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 76% (25/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (13/26) | 73% (53/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (177/218) | 58% (394/284) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 76% (25/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.47 |
Aces Total | 87 | 155 |
DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 52 | 65 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:24 | 1:29:38 |
Avg Opp Rank | 166.83 | 116.88 |
1st Serve % | 64% (800/1251) | 69% (1432/2081) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (544/800) | 72% (1038/1432) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (213/451) | 54% (347/648) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/93) | 44% (108/245) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (431/1211) | 43% (930/2183) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (25/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 78% (25/32) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 63% (5/8) |
1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 92% (25/23) |
1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 8% (25/2) |
1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 25% (8/2) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H |
view more
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
SF |
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
Player
Marek Gengel
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marek Gengel
Player
Millen Hurrion
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Kris Van Wyk
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Matthew Hulme
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Vadym Ursu
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marek Gengel
Player
Lorenzo Lorusso
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more