Brandon Nakashima vs Christopher O\'Connell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs O\'Connell analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Christopher O\'Connell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.68% of points on his second serve, while O\'Connell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while O\'Connell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.32% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas O\'Connell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 59.46% of matches played (W/L 44/ 30), with O\'Connell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 20/ 21). O\'Connell has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as O\'Connell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.11 while O\'Connell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while O\'Connell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and O\'Connell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 0 - 0 O\'Connell
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima VS O\'Connell H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Christopher O\'Connell |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 74% (26/9) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 70% (53/23) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (423/346) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.7 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 264 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 50 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:13 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 298.89 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 65% (1548/2369) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 76% (1169/1548) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (472/821) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (71/213) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 37% (945/2541) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 80% (4/1) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (25/34) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (12/16) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 92% (24/22) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 8% (24/2) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 1st Match |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Christopher O\'Connell Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available