Brandon Nakashima vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.36% of points on his second serve, while Evans has won 51.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 48.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.24% and 24.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 60.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Evans winning 32.43% (W/L 12/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 45/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 29.41% of matches (W/L 5/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nakashima winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 5 and Evans winning 2. The last match between Nakashima and Evans was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 15-04-2024, First, Clay with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Evans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Evans 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 2, and Evans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.39 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 134.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 29.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 1 Evans
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
81
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
69
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
23
Total
0
Mast
9
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
13
Minor
Form
62% (186-116)
Career Total W/L
60% (550-370)
74% (28-10)
YTD W/L
23% (3-10)
$1,608,265
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Daniel Evans |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
Games Won | 39 | 29 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 14 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:58 | 1:55:58 |
1st Serve % | 57% (123/214) | 59% (137/231) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (86/123) | 60% (82/137) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (53/91) | 55% (52/94) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (10/25) | 46% (6/13) |
Return Points W% | 42% (97/231) | 35% (75/214) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 6-2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Daniel Evans
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
7-6(1) 6-0 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Daniel Evans |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 74% (28/10) | 23% (3/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 69% (58/26) | 33% (11/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (471/383) | 45% (145/179) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 30% (3/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.24 |
Aces Total | 297 | 38 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 53 | 46 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:31 | 2:9:55 |
Avg Opp Rank | 284.29 | 162.31 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1743/2660) | 57% (579/1015) |
1st Serve W% | 76% (1318/1743) | 71% (409/579) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (523/917) | 52% (225/436) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (80/235) | 30% (22/74) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (1051/2826) | 34% (352/1039) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 71% (5/2) | 25% (1/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 25% (2/6) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 25% (3/12) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (14/20) | 0% (0/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 20% (1/5) |
1st set W, W | 89% (27/24) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set W, L | 11% (27/3) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 13% (8/1) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Shelton
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Daniel Evans
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Evans
Player
Roman Safiullin
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordan Thompson
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more