Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Jack Draper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Draper analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Jack Draper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.36% of points on his second serve, while Draper has won 51.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Draper has won 53.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.24% and 31.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Draper has saved 67.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Draper winning 66.67% (W/L 36/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22). Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 1 and Draper winning 2. The last match between Nakashima and Draper was at the Bergamo Challenger, 04-11-2023, Semifinals, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Draper have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Draper 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Draper 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.39 while Draper has played against players with an average rank of 163.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Draper has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Draper has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 0 - 1 Draper
81
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
43
Rank
37
High
22
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
62% (186-116)
Career Total W/L
69% (200-90)
74% (28-10)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$1,608,265
Career Prize Money
$1,407,850
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:12 | 2:13:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (60/96) | 66% (57/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (40/60) | 77% (44/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (18/36) | 48% (14/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (28/86) | 40% (38/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
17
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (28/10) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (58/26) | 58% (31/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (471/383) | 55% (276/223) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.58 |
| Aces Total | 297 | 142 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:31 | 2:8:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.29 | 102.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1743/2660) | 58% (896/1539) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1318/1743) | 76% (677/896) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (523/917) | 50% (322/643) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (80/235) | 51% (71/140) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1051/2826) | 39% (601/1533) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (5/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 69% (9/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 63% (10/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (14/20) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (27/24) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (27/3) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 33% (6/2) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Jack Draper
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jack Draper
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakashima Vs Draper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
