Brandon Nakashima vs Matteo Arnaldi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Arnaldi analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Matteo Arnaldi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.36% of points on his second serve, while Arnaldi has won 50.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Arnaldi has won 48.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.24% and 29.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arnaldi has saved 60.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Arnaldi winning 65.71% (W/L 46/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22). Arnaldi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 118/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Arnaldi has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.39 while Arnaldi has played against players with an average rank of 170.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arnaldi has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arnaldi has converted 34.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 0 - 0 Arnaldi
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
81
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
36
Rank
35
High
23
Age
Plays
6
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
62% (186-116)
Career Total W/L
63% (200-115)
74% (28-10)
YTD W/L
57% (13-10)
$1,608,265
Career Prize Money
$1,162,145
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Matteo Arnaldi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 74% (28/10) | 57% (13/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 69% (58/26) | 54% (31/26) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (471/383) | 50% (290/289) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 56% (10/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.59 |
Aces Total | 297 | 168 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 53 | 62 |
Avg Match Time | 1:46:31 | 2:7:54 |
Avg Opp Rank | 284.29 | 181.83 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1743/2660) | 56% (1061/1882) |
1st Serve W% | 76% (1318/1743) | 72% (766/1061) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (523/917) | 50% (414/821) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (80/235) | 36% (62/174) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (1051/2826) | 37% (706/1891) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 71% (5/2) | 57% (4/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 57% (8/6) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 55% (11/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (14/20) | 67% (8/12) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 45% (5/11) |
1st set W, W | 89% (27/24) | 75% (12/9) |
1st set W, L | 11% (27/3) | 25% (12/3) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 30% (10/3) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reda Bennani
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
Matteo Arnaldi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Casper Ruud
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Marco Trungelliti
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Sebastian Baez
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
125)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Denis Shapovalov
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Alexander Bublik
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Fils
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more