Brandon Nakashima vs Paolo Lorenzi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Lorenzi analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Paolo Lorenzi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 55.67% of points on his second serve, while Lorenzi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 50.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lorenzi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.69% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 69.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lorenzi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Lorenzi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 16/ 20). Lorenzi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 467/ 329), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 19% (W/L 7/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Lorenzi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 3 and Lorenzi winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Lorenzi was at the U.S. Open - New York, 31-08-2020, First, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Lorenzi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakashima winning 0 times and Lorenzi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 1, and Lorenzi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.14 while Lorenzi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lorenzi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 37.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lorenzi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Lorenzi
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
92
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
33
High
42
Age
R
Plays
25
Total
0
Mast
21
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
3
Minor
Form
61% (180-114)
Career Total W/L
54% (661-552)
73% (22-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,571,090
Career Prize Money
$2,093,629
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Paolo Lorenzi |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
Games Won | 19 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (58/87) | 55% (46/84) |
1st Serve Win% | 86% (50/58) | 78% (36/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 62% (18/29) | 42% (16/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 38% (32/84) | 22% (19/87) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 7-6(3) |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
19 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
100
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Paolo Lorenzi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (22/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 68% (45/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (362/304) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.72 | 0 |
Aces Total | 236 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:47 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 307.3 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1345/2043) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (1012/1345) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (398/698) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (60/173) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (809/2180) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 77% (10/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
SF |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
22 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
James Kent Trotter
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Joris De Loore
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
11
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Paolo Lorenzi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Maxime Janvier
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Joao Sousa
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
10
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
13%
(
5 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paolo Lorenzi
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
29 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sam Riffice
Player
Paolo Lorenzi
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more