Brandon Nakashima vs Peter Polansky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Polansky analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Peter Polansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.58% of points on his second serve, while Polansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Polansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.06% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 71.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 58.67% of matches played (W/L 44/ 31), with Polansky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 20/ 22). Polansky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Polansky has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Polansky winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Polansky was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 29-10-2019, Second, I.hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Polansky have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Polansky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Polansky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.71 while Polansky has played against players with an average rank of 269.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Polansky
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
721
Rank
110
High
35
Age
R
Plays
19
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
15
Minor
Form
61% (184-116)
Career Total W/L
56% (541-428)
72% (26-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,608,265
Career Prize Money
$541,225
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Peter Polansky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 2:4:42 | 2:4:42 |
1st Serve % | 61% (47/77) | 53% (52/98) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (35/47) | 73% (38/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (20/30) | 39% (18/46) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 43% (42/98) | 29% (22/77) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 4-6 6-1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Peter Polansky
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
52 of
98)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Peter Polansky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 72% (26/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 68% (54/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (439/362) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.71 | 0 |
Aces Total | 278 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:40 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 294.19 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1625/2494) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (1222/1625) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (498/869) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (73/217) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (976/2634) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (25/35) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (12/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 88% (25/22) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 12% (25/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more