Brayden Schnur vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schnur vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Brayden Schnur vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schnur has won 47.83% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schnur, in recent form, has won 48.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schnur has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schnur has won 30% of matches played (W/L 3/ 7), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schnur has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 11/ 17). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Schnur has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5), where as Przysiezny has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schnur winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schnur winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 0. The last match between Schnur and Przysiezny was at the Drummondville Challenger, 14-03-2018, First, I.hard with Brayden Schnur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schnur and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schnur winning 0 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Schnur winning 1, and Przysiezny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schnur has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.4 while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schnur has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schnur has converted 15.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schnur 1 - 0 Przysiezny
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
876
Rank
92
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
52% (221-200)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$240,710
Career Prize Money
$403,630
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schnur VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Brayden Schnur | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:56 | 1:31:56 |
1st Serve % | 75% (48/64) | 56% (46/82) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (36/48) | 76% (35/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 28% (10/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 45% (37/82) | 27% (17/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schnur VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-2 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brayden Schnur | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Brayden Schnur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Collin Altamirano
Player
Brayden Schnur
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
8
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Skander Mansouri
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Clement Chidekh
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
August Holmgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
57%
(
75 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
17
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
66 of
90)
60%
(
34 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
30%
(
40 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
136)
138
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(8) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Brayden Schnur
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
7
Aces
7
13
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(11) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Toby Samuel
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Darian King
Player
Brayden Schnur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Purcell
Player
Brayden Schnur
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Maxime Cressy
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
7
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
19
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more