Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gadamauri vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Buvaysar Gadamauri vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gadamauri has won 48.79% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gadamauri, in recent form, has won 49.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gadamauri has saved 60.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gadamauri has won 59.46% of matches played (W/L 44/ 30), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gadamauri has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 51/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 20/ 17). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gadamauri has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 42/ 28), where as Minc has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gadamauri winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gadamauri winning 2 and Minc winning 0. The last match between Gadamauri and Minc was at the M15 Huy, 24-08-2021, Q3, Clay with Buvaysar Gadamauri getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gadamauri and Minc have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gadamauri winning 0 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gadamauri winning 0, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gadamauri has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.38 while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gadamauri has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gadamauri has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gadamauri 1 - 0 Minc
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
534
Rank
530
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (186-128)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
43% (6-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Buvaysar Gadamauri | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (23/40) | 59% (33/56) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (18/23) | 45% (15/33) |
2nd Serve Win% | 71% (12/17) | 39% (9/23) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 57% (32/56) | 25% (10/40) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Buvaysar Gadamauri | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (13/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (150/165) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
Aces Total | 65 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:21 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 290.14 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (613/1012) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (420/613) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (202/399) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (32/84) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (358/1000) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Buvaysar Gadamauri Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jelle Sels
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Florian Broska
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Remy Bertola
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fabien Salle
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
6
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Mark Whitehouse
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Rottoli
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
QF |
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more