Cadence Brace vs Elvina Kalieva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 10:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Brace vs E. Kalieva

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Brace 1 - 0 Kalieva
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cadence Brace winning 2 and Elvina Kalieva winning 1. The last match between Cadence Brace and Elvina Kalieva was at the Abierto Tampico - Tampico, 16-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brace | 1 |
| Kalieva | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Abierto Tampico - Tampico(10-16-25)
C. Brace vs E. Kalieva H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $68,925 | Career Prize Money | $128,779 |
| 59.15% (126-87) | Career Total W/L | 51.84% (169-157) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Brace vs E. Kalieva Match Preview:
- Elvina Kalieva has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 39.37% of points, compared to Cadence Brace's 38.98%. Could this be crucial in determining the winner?
- When it comes to return game stats, Kalieva again leads with a 52.96% success rate on opponents' second serves, versus Brace's 50.15%. On first serve returns, Kalieva is marginally better with 35.65% compared to 34.75% for Brace.
- Under pressure, Kalieva shows more resilience by saving 46.61% of breakpoints, whereas Brace saves 43.97%.
- In the past year, Brace has the upper hand with a 64.71% match win rate, significantly higher than Kalieva’s 51.43%.
- If the surface matters, Kalieva excels on clay (56%) but struggles on grass (38%), while Brace is at her best on hard courts (56%) and shows her weakest performance on indoor hard courts (54%).
- Both players have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Brace having a better recent win rate of 66.67%, compared to Kalieva's 51.52%.
- Brace typically faces less challenging opponents, with an average rank of 376.22, whereas Kalieva's opponents sit at 314.5.
- In deciding sets, Brace dominates, winning 69% of the time, while Kalieva only wins 41% of them.
- Current event performance and specific event preferences could provide additional insights and should be considered during the match.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
When examining the comparative statistics of Elvina Kalieva and Cadence Brace, their strengths and weaknesses highlight different competitive edges. Kalieva demonstrates robustness on return games and under pressure, retaining marginal dominance in second serves and breakpoints.
Brace, however, outshines with a superior overall win rate in the past year and better performance in deciding sets, which could be pivotal if the match reaches a critical stage.
Despite Kalieva's slight lead in technical areas like serve and return, Brace's consistent results and ability to close in tense situations provide her with a substantial advantage. Thus, based on the available statistics, Cadence Brace is favored to win this upcoming match.
Cadence Brace vs Elvina Kalieva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Brace vs E. Kalieva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:55:43 | Average Match Time | 2:55:43 |
| 66% (71/108) | 1st Serve % | 52% (49/94) |
| 61% (43/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (29/49) |
| 51% (19/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (20/45) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 48% (45/94) | Return Points Win % | 43% (46/108) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Brace Recent Matches Played
E. Kalieva Recent Matches Played

C. Brace vs E. Kalieva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.15% (126/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.84% (169/157) |
| 58.49% (279/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.93% (384/370) |
| 54.56% (2326/1937) | Games Win/Loss | 50.52% (3534/3461) |
| 61.72% (79/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.92% (68/71) |
| 56.67% (34/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.00% (84/66) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.28% (14/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 721 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 584 | Total Double Faults | 1324 |
| 1:45:28 | Average Match Time | 1:39:24 |
| 449.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.4 |
| 61% (8192/13411) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11772/21053) |
| 62% (5042/8192) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7261/11772) |
| 47% (2461/5219) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4174/9281) |
| 53% (863/1641) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1275/2696) |
| 47% (6115/12966) | Return Points Win % | 46% (9714/21202) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Main Tour W/L | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 58.64% (112/79) | Challenger W/L | 53.85% (140/120) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (16/12) |
| 60% (124/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (162/319) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 45% (17/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (31/74) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (53/105) |
| 90% (125/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (164/136) |
| 10% (125/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (164/28) |
| 15% (88/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (162/31) |