Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Tina Nadine Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 01:09 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Wilda Hennemann vs T. Nadine Smith

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Smith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann winning 2 and Tina Nadine Smith winning 0. The last match between Caijsa Wilda Hennemann and Tina Nadine Smith was at the W35 Amstelveen, 03-07-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hennemann | 1 |
Smith | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R3) W35 Amstelveen(07-03-25)
C. W. Hennemann vs T. N. Smith H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $1,915 |
64.36% (195-108) | Career Total W/L | 56.66% (200-153) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
9 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. W. Hennemann vs T. N. Smith Match Preview:
- How do recent second serve performances compare between the players? Smith has a superior performance, winning 42.71% of points, compared to Hennemann's 23.59%, indicating an edge for Smith in this area.
- Return game effectiveness shows Hennemann leads in both second serve returns at 59.88% and first serve returns at 49.67%, outclassing Smith's 50.52% and 34.68% respectively. This suggests Hennemann might excel in breaking serve.
- Analyzing under pressure situations, Hennemann has saved 48.78% of breakpoints, which slightly surpasses Smith's 44.86%.
- Which player has a better recent win percentage? Hennemann, with a 77.78% win rate over the past year, significantly outshines Smith's 57.97%.
- Both players have different surface preferences; Smith excels on Grass with a 62% win rate, while Hennemann favors Clay, boasting a 64% win rate.
- In terms of tournament level and opponent ranking, Smith has faced opponents with an average rank of 418.57, while Hennemann's opponents have an average rank of 395, suggesting Hennemann faces slightly stronger competition.
- For deciding sets, Hennemann has a stronger track record, winning 67% of them, compared to Smith's 47%, which could be decisive in close matches.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Hennemann again leads with 47.73% efficiency, above Smith's 39.87%.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Smith demonstrates a clear advantage in second serve performance, which is crucial for maintaining service games, yet Hennemann's ability to return effectively could mitigate this advantage.
Hennemann's standout performance in both first and second serve returns points to a strong capability for generating break opportunities, a key factor considering their higher breakpoint conversion rate.
Overall match win percentages and Hennemann's higher success rate in deciding sets further suggest that Hennemann has the upper hand in terms of current form and psychological advantage during key match moments.
Taking into account the analyzed strengths and recent trends, Hennemann appears to be the more likely winner for the upcoming match due to their superior return game, breakpoint efficiency, and overall match success rate.
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Tina Nadine Smith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. W. Hennemann vs T. N. Smith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:55:14 | Average Match Time | 1:55:14 |
78% (45/58) | 1st Serve % | 66% (41/62) |
62% (28/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (20/41) |
54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
56% (35/62) | Return Points Win % | 40% (23/58) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. W. Hennemann Recent Matches Played
T. N. Smith Recent Matches Played

C. W. Hennemann vs T. N. Smith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.36% (195/108) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.66% (200/153) |
61.19% (421/267) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.60% (447/357) |
54.92% (3385/2779) | Games Win/Loss | 52.87% (3868/3448) |
63.64% (14/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (44/44) |
65.25% (154/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.85% (133/93) |
60.00% (27/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.69% (15/11) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
241 | Aces Total | 485 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
496 | Total Double Faults | 792 |
1:34:3 | Average Match Time | 1:35:56 |
496.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 451.08 |
67% (11837/17694) | 1st Serve % | 62% (12700/20423) |
57% (6747/11837) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7805/12700) |
47% (2747/5875) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3683/7723) |
51% (1244/2417) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1188/2461) |
50% (8472/17094) | Return Points Win % | 45% (9114/20055) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
60.00% (9/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
56.69% (89/68) | Challenger W/L | 56.51% (152/117) |
74.05% (97/34) | Futures W/L | 61.84% (47/29) |
64% (192/300) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (197/348) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
57% (25/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (32/64) |
60% (50/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (52/101) |
88% (194/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (203/178) |
12% (194/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (203/25) |
22% (109/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (150/22) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
