Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calin Manda vs Lenny Hampel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Manda vs Hampel analysis and find out who is favored!
Calin Manda vs Lenny Hampel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manda has won 54.91% of points on his second serve, while Hampel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manda, in recent form, has won 49.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hampel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manda has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hampel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manda has won 52.83% of matches played (W/L 28/ 25), with Hampel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Hampel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Manda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25), where as Hampel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Manda winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Manda winning 0 and Hampel winning 4. The last match between Manda and Hampel was at the M25 Kottingbrunn, 21-07-2021, First, Clay with Lenny Hampel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manda and Hampel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Manda winning 0 times and Hampel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manda winning 0, and Hampel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manda has played against opponents with an average rank of 228.47 while Hampel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manda has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hampel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manda has converted 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hampel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Manda 0 - 2 Hampel
798
Rank
607
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
359
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
54% (216-182)
Career Total W/L
60% (255-171)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$6,945
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Calin Manda | Lenny Hampel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 10 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (71/105) | 49% (48/98) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (37/71) | 79% (38/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (15/34) | 56% (28/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 50% (8/16) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (32/98) | 50% (53/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Lenny Hampel
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 6-1 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Calin Manda
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve %
80%
(
24 of
30)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calin Manda | Lenny Hampel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (66/91) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 120.29 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (310/471) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (182/310) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (78/161) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (17/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (170/474) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Lenny Hampel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Andre Biro
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Lenny Hampel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Lenny Hampel
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Matic Dimic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 0-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Neil Oberleitner
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Manda Vs Hampel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
