Calin Manda vs Michal Novansky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Manda vs Novansky analysis and find out who is favored!
Calin Manda vs Michal Novansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manda has won 54.91% of points on his second serve, while Novansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manda, in recent form, has won 49.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Novansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manda has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Novansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manda has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Novansky winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Novansky has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 22/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Manda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 26), where as Novansky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Manda winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Manda winning 2 and Novansky winning 0. The last match between Manda and Novansky was at the M25 Telfs, 12-07-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manda and Novansky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Manda winning 0 times and Novansky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manda winning 0, and Novansky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manda has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.44 while Novansky has played against players with an average rank of 74.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manda has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Novansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manda has converted 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Novansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Manda 1 - 0 Novansky
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
754
Rank
607
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (216-182)
Career Total W/L
49% (48-50)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Calin Manda | Michal Novansky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (43/67) | 56% (37/66) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 59% (22/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (13/24) | 48% (14/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Points W% | 45% (30/66) | 36% (24/67) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
Calin Manda
Player
Michal Novansky
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Calin Manda | Michal Novansky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 29% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (66/91) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 22 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:29:34 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 120.29 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (310/471) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 59% (182/310) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (78/161) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 45% (17/38) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (170/474) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Michal Novansky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Michal Novansky
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
29 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
51
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Peter Nad
Player
Michal Novansky
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Josip Simundza
Player
Michal Novansky
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Michal Novansky
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mika Brunold
Player
Michal Novansky
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
61%
(
30 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-7(11) 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Michal Novansky
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more