Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calum Puttergill vs Blake Mott Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puttergill vs Mott analysis and find out who is favored!
Calum Puttergill vs Blake Mott Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puttergill has won 48.45% of points on his second serve, while Mott has won 44.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puttergill, in recent form, has won 55.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mott has won 54.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.99% and 31.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puttergill has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mott has saved 46.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puttergill has won 37.04% of matches played (W/L 10/ 17), with Mott winning 68.97% (W/L 40/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Puttergill winning 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Puttergill winning 1 and Mott winning 6. The last match between Puttergill and Mott was at the M25 Darwin, 28-09-2019, Final, Hard with Blake Mott getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Puttergill and Mott have played a deciding set 1 times, with Puttergill winning 0 times and Mott 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Puttergill winning 0, and Mott 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puttergill has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.52 while Mott has played against players with an average rank of 143.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puttergill has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mott has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puttergill has converted 51.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mott has converted 42.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Puttergill 0 - 3 Mott
879
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
411
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
50% (170-172)
Career Total W/L
57% (215-161)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
54% (7-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$133,500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Puttergill VS Mott H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Calum Puttergill | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 6 |
| Games Won | 19 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:45 | 1:9:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (79/130) | 71% (120/168) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (42/79) | 69% (83/120) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (23/51) | 40% (19/48) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 53% (9/17) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (66/168) | 50% (65/130) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Puttergill VS Mott H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Calum Puttergill
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
76 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calum Puttergill | Blake Mott |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 54% (7/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 55% (16/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (71/69) | 51% (138/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:52 | 1:27:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.83 | 173.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (282/442) | 64% (455/707) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (184/282) | 75% (339/455) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (77/160) | 42% (107/252) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (23/40) | 41% (31/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (198/458) | 40% (297/749) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 54% (7/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Calum Puttergill
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jannik Opitz
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ajeet Rai
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Blake Mott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Puttergill Vs Mott Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
