Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calvin Hemery vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hemery vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!
Calvin Hemery vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hemery has won 50.59% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hemery, in recent form, has won 45.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.75% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hemery has saved 58.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hemery has won 62.82% of matches played (W/L 49/ 29), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 182/ 117), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.4% of matches (W/L 35/ 22), where as Beem has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hemery winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hemery winning 2 and Beem winning 0. The last match between Hemery and Beem was at the Kuwait F2, 17-11-2014, Second, Hard with Calvin Hemery getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hemery and Beem have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hemery winning 0 times and Beem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hemery winning 0, and Beem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hemery has played against opponents with an average rank of 292.13 while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hemery has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hemery has converted 36.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hemery 1 - 0 Beem
194
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
59% (360-255)
Career Total W/L
56% (191-153)
43% (10-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$181,475
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Colin Van Beem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 10 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-1 ret. | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Colin Van Beem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (10/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (24/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (253/265) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 149 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 322.35 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1020/1614) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (725/1020) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (302/594) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (47/129) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (579/1615) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (9/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Hemery Vs Beem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Calvin Hemery
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
